Search for: "John Does 1-18" Results 121 - 140 of 2,960
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2019, 11:39 am by John Elwood
John Elwood hastily reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 5:17 am
Originally published on January 18, 2010. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 3:13 pm by Bob Bauer, Quinta Jurecic
§ 371 for conspiracy to defraud the United States through impeding the Federal Election Commission in carrying out its duties, and second, causing false statements under 18 USC § 1001 and 18 USC § 1519, by causing the campaign to file false FEC reports. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 9:09 am
Blair, Director of National Intelligence, responding to the release of additional torture memos by Steven Bradbury, Jay Bybee, and John Yoo.MEMORANDUM FROM STEVEN BRADBURY, JAY BYBEE, AND JOHN YOO, OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL, TO JOHN RIZZO, GENERAL COUNSEL, CIA:You have asked for this Office's views on whether the technique known as "second-guessing" would violate the prohibition on torture found at Section 2340A of title 18 of the United States Code. … [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 8:00 am
Blair, Director of National Intelligence, responding to the release of additional torture memos by Steven Bradbury, Jay Bybee, and John Yoo.MEMORANDUM FROM STEVEN BRADBURY, JAY BYBEE, AND JOHN YOO, OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL, TO JOHN RIZZO, GENERAL COUNSEL, CIA:You have asked for this Office's views on whether the technique known as "second-guessing" would violate the prohibition on torture found at Section 2340A of title 18 of the United States Code. … [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
§ 784.041(1) (felony battery) is an indivisible statute that is categorically a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:11 am by Michael C. Smith
Tex. 7/27/12) Judge: John Love Holding: Motion to Dismiss the Indirect Infringement Counts from the Complaint GRANTED IN PART Defendants argued that the plaintiff's complaint failed to adequately plead any form of indirect infringement because: (1) it does not allege that Defendants had knowledge of the ‘514 patent orthe required specific intent and (2) it fails to identify a direct infringer. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:55 pm
On November 17, 1973, the White House informed Federal District Judge John Sirica that the 18 1/2 minute Nixon-Haldeman conversation of June 20, 1972, had been erased. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm by centerforartlaw
If the case does not settle, the court is likely to grapple with the issue of valuation of the damaged pieces. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
ENTERED: April 18, 2023 Footnotes Footnote 1: Defendants John/Jane Does I-XX have not appeared in this action or sought representation from the Attorney General. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
ENTERED: April 18, 2023 Footnotes Footnote 1: Defendants John/Jane Does I-XX have not appeared in this action or sought representation from the Attorney General. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 3:26 pm
Does that include the possibility of a nuclear strike? [read post]