Search for: "John M Barrett" Results 121 - 140 of 301
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2010, 8:51 am by law shucks
Update 2: Per K&L Gates, Corporate/M&A: Kevin Stichter, Norfleet Pruden, Brett Durham (all Charlotte) Antitrust: Jim Weiss, John Longstreth, Brian McCalmon (all Washington, D.C.) [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 3:57 pm by Mark Walsh
“Do you understand how I’m suddenly seeing this and I’m totally at sea? [read post]
3 May 2009, 2:08 am
  I'm planning to spend most of my time here this month blogging about law teaching and technology. [read post]
20 May 2011, 12:04 am by Jeffrey Richardson
  I'm just starting to try out this app myself; Barrett thinks that the user interface needs improvement. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:59 am
Bell BP, Goldoft M, Griffin PM, Davis MA, Gordon DC, Tarr PI, Bartleson CA, Lewis JH, Barrett TJ, Wells JG, and et al. 1994. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
  John Gruber of Daring Fireball explains how. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 4:34 am by Edith Roberts
Barrett looks back at a Senate delay in considering the nomination of Justice John M. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 8:21 pm
McHugh, Dawn Marie Messer, Felix Christopher Mitchell, John M. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:41 pm
“iProperty: Protecting Ideas in an Age of Global Innovation” by William Barrett, Chris Price, and Tom Hunt (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) is available at Amazon. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm by Josh Blackman
But Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett votes to grant cert. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 9:50 am by Eugene Volokh
I’m pleased to say that my students Nate Barrett, Charles Linehan and Michael Smith and I filed a friend of the court brief in the case on behalf of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (many thanks to our invaluable pro bono local counsel, Daniel Schmutter of Hartman & Winnicki), and I also argued on behalf of amici, alongside defendant’s lawyer Garen Meguerian. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 pm by Stephen Halbrook
Not boding well for Wright's facial challenge based on lack of historical analogues was Justice Barrett's interjection that "I'm so confused," after which Justice Kagan piled on, "you're running away from your argument … because the implications of your argument are just so untenable. [read post]