Search for: "John T. Kent"
Results 121 - 140
of 692
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2019, 2:19 pm
The new trial order was signed by trial judge Mark Kent Ellis on May 28, 2013. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 3:45 am
” Additional commentary comes from John Bursch at the Acton Institute and Ian Millhiser at Vox (via How Appealing). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 10:31 am
John McCain, is the executive director of the McCain Institute for International Leadership. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 7:25 am
Why isn't my information listed in the census? [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 8:38 am
And if such charges don’t happen, that doesn’t mean they weren’t planned but, rather, that some extrinsic event has intervened. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 9:30 pm
Congratulations to Christopher Schmidt, Chicago-Kent College of Law, editor of Law and Social Inquiry, and another former LHB Guest Blogger upon his appointment as Research Professor at the American Bar Foundation.The Robbins Collection & Research Center at Berkeley Law is convening an event on the "intellectual legacy of John T. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
John Manley and Bill C-34 (37-2). [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am
Plaintiffs' purported equitable cause of action, based only on an ultra vires claim, would have been unknown to William Blackstone, Chancellor Kent, or Justice Story. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:22 am
” John R. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:17 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that the court’s decision in Mitchell v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that “[a] broad attack on supervised release revocations would indeed be a grave concern,” and that although “[t]he direct effects of [yester]day’s decision are not severe, … future developments warrant monitoring. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:45 pm
Sotomayor has a snappy opening to her dissent, but she doesn’t read it from the bench. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:41 am
• Gerald T. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:41 am
• Gerald T. [read post]
28 May 2019, 4:39 am
:Ames, Roger T. and Wimal Dissanayake, eds. [read post]
20 May 2019, 10:55 am
Despite the seeming centrality of the Take Care Clause to the definition of executive power, the Supreme Court has not said very much about the clause, as Jack Goldsmith and John Manning have noted. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:08 am
” Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 8:21 am
” While Mueller doesn’t point to the oath of office, it’s notable that Kent, Leib and Shugerman situate the Take Care Clause alongside the oath as “the twin commands of faithful execution,” emphasizing the president’s “duty of fidelity” to the law. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm
(Cole.pdf) John F. [read post]
