Search for: "Johnson v. Ray" Results 121 - 140 of 141
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Ray Girouard was a squad leader and sergeant in CHARLIE company, one of the companies in Nate Johnson's 3rd battalion.Nate Johnson was one of Ray's senior officers. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica)   Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP)   Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 4:03 pm
" Mike Steele (brigade commander) was Nathaniel Johnson's, Jr. boss. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46)   Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (IP finance), United States: An open letter for the General Counsel of the PTO on your San Diego presentation next week: (Hal Wegner), United States: Cocoa genome: breaking intellectual property barriers: (Thomson Reuters Scientific), Vietnam: Patentability of second medical use claims in Vietnam is again questionable: (Trung Truc JSC)   Pharma & Biotech - Products Allegra (Fexofenadine) - Canada: Motion for summary judgment of noninfringement dismissed in patent infringement… [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
JOHNSON SURVEY, MARION COUNTY, TEXAS AND A .22 CALIBER RUGER SEMI-AUTOMATIC PISTOL v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 1:42 am
(PDF 1.2 MB) Report Prepared Under the Auspices of the National Intelligence Council03/19/2008 Lawsuit Filed in the Matter of Fred Hollander v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:08 am
Louis, MO 63103 Phone: (314) 241-3464 Fax: (314) 371-0000 E-mail: mogoodwill@mo-goodwill.org Web: http://www.mersgoodwill.org Healthcare Family Voices Missouri Sarah Zerr Phone: (816) 455-2977 E-mail: shzkcmo@aol.com The state's Title V agency will soon have a Family Advisory Council, led by a parent facilitator, who provide information and support to parent groups in Missouri, and will also ensure the family perspective and input on major Title V decisions affecting… [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:43 pm
Johnson County Includes the cities of Kite and Wrightsville. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 9:02 am
HOWEVER, an even more interesting story is that of Exxon v. [read post]