Search for: "Johnson v. State of Ohio" Results 121 - 140 of 697
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
President Andrew Johnson and his allies hoped to carry out a swift reconstruction, requiring only that southern states ratify the Thirteenth Amendment abolishing slavery, repudiate all war debts, and void ordinances of succession.17 The Radical Republicans, led by the “Dictator of Congress,” Rep. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In the Intercept, Glenn Greenwald draws attention to the fact that Amazon is itself involved in the building of a surveillance state. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 2:29 pm by anbrandon
Burris himself will see no relief.Several prior cases stood in the way of this decision, most notably United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 5:00 am by Dan Maurer
There was the abrupt announcement of “mission accomplished” against the Islamic State in Syria and the decision to withdrawal substantial forces from Afghanistan, contrary to advice from senior military commanders and to the surprise of most of Congress. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 6:19 am by MBettman
Johnson, 136 Ohio St. 95 (1939) (The word “creditor” in R.C. 2117.06 means “all persons having rights of action against the decedent. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by John Elwood
The state of Ohio argues that the 6th Circuit was insufficiently deferential to the state courts’ determinations. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 6:40 am by MBettman
Johnson & Johnson, 2007-Ohio-6948 (Ohio’s statutory scheme concerning caps on compensatory and punitive damages—R.C. 2315.18 and 2315.21—are facially constitutional.) [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:16 am by Eugene Volokh
We're asking the Ohio Supreme Court to review the decision upholding it.A few weeks ago, Patrick Kabat (Chandra Law), Carolyn Allen, and I filed an appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court, asking it to agree to review a very interesting -- and, in my view, troubling -- Ohio Court of Appeals decision. [read post]