Search for: "Jones v. England"
Results 121 - 140
of 293
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2015, 4:35 pm
Section 9(2) codified the approach of the Court of Appeal in Dow Jones v Jameel [2005] EWCA Civ 75 (03 February 2005) established that there needs to be a real and substantial tort within the jurisdiction for a defamation claim to be made (see also Sullivan v Bristol Film Studios [2012] EWCA civ 570 (03 May 2012); Reed Elsevier (t/a Lexisnexis) v Bewry [2014] EWCA Civ 1411 (30 October 2014)). [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am
Riley, 14-1472, and Jones v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
Stryker Corp. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 4:30 pm
None of the factors relied on by Clifford to show an abuse of process under the principles in Dow Jones & Co Inc v Jameel [2005] EWCA Civ 75 had much weight. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 11:22 pm
Of note on account of the fact that it pitches one seasoned manipulator of the media against another is Paul Burrell v Max Clifford [2015] EWHC 2001 (Ch), a High Court, Chancery Division, decision from England and Wales, delivered by Mr Justice Mann on Monday of this week. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 11:20 pm
Jones, which means that if the hapless landlords get things wrong by even a single day the notice will be less than 2 months and all bets are off again. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:25 pm
On the subject of trivial claims, it is further noted that, despite several opportunities, New Zealand courts have so far refused to adopt the doctrine in Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc ([2005] QB 946). [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
In addition to the key case of Rottmann v Freistaat Bayern [2010] ECR I-1449 numerous other authorities such as Kaur [2001] All ER (EC) 250, McCarthy [2011] All ER (EC) 729 Zambrano [2011] ECR I-1177 and Dereci [2011] ECR I-11315 were analysed and applied to his case. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 5:20 am
In a case called Brady v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 4:09 pm
This was said to be on the ground that Many commentators have noticed the different political views of the Sun in England and in Scotland. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am
After conducting a survey of the classifications used in the authorities including Campbell v MGN [2004] AC 457, Douglas v Hello! [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
Former England footballer Paul Gascoigne is suing Express Newspapers after a 2013 front page headlined “Gazza on drunken betting spree”. [read post]
25 Dec 2014, 4:01 pm
" was the famous line delivered by Corporal Jones (right) in the popular BBC television comedy Dad's Army (here and here). [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 4:53 am
In The New England Journal of Medicine, Nicholas Bagley, David Jones, and Timothy Jost discuss the possible impact of a decision in favor of the challengers in King v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:36 am
This will mean that the line of cases involving saving provisions such as Lower St Properties v Jones are now irrelevant. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
Darren was followed by Matthew Jones (EIP), who tackled the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court for England and Wales, which has become an essential tool for many claimants in need of speedy IP litigation. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:47 am
Darren was followed by Matthew Jones (EIP), who abandoned the PowerPoint in favour of the flipchart. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 12:18 pm
In Fraser v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
This one is Chanel Inc. v Chanel’s Salon and Chanel Jones, 2:14-cv-00304, and sees fashion and cosmetics company Chanel as plaintiff. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 1:22 am
In that case, there were only five downloads in England, three of which were by agents or associates of the claims. [read post]
