Search for: "Jones v. Sullivan*" Results 121 - 140 of 179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The issue of readers flouting copyright was highlighted last month when Guardian columnist Owen Jones used his Twitter feed to publish almost an entire Sunday Times investigation into the UK government’s handling of the Covid-19 crisis. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
New Zealand’s Zombie Defamation Survival Guide: Solving the Grave State of Defamation Law with a Single Publication Rule, Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Paper No. 22/2020, Hannah Jones, Victoria University of Wellington, Faculty of Law, Student/Alumni. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 5:59 am
  Government Whistleblowers; Implications of Garcetti v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:48 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg BNA, Chris Marr looks at American Business USA Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
There are no new PCC adjudications this week, but four new resolved PCC cases: Mr Johnny Dean v NME NME, Clause 3, 25/01/2013; Mr Ian Calland v Golf Monthly, Clause 1, 24/01/2013; Mr Martin Jones v Reading Post, Clause 1, 24/01/2013 and Dame Tessa Jowell v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 24/01/2013. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm by James Romoser
Jones that the president should not be subject to a sexual-harassment lawsuit while he was in office. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 12:31 am
In a case where someone states an opinion that appears to be based on knowledge of facts, such as the statement, "In my opinion, John Jones is a liar," can have just as much of a damaging effect as the statement, "John Jones is a liar. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Recent cases citing these rights together include Watson v Campos [2016] IEHC 18 (14 January 2016) [28] (Barrett J); Rooney v Shell E&P Ireland [2017] IEHC 63 (20 January 2017) [31]-[32] (Ní Raifeartaigh J); Ryanair v Channel 4 Television [2017] IEHC 651 (05 October 2017) [49]-[52] (Meenan J). [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
Part V: The Separation of Powers Every casebook included Morrison v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am by INFORRM
Two days later, Judge Gibson dismissed proceedings in Zimmerman v Perkiss (No.2) [2022] NSWDC 458. [read post]