Search for: "Judge Hardwick" Results 121 - 140 of 188
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2011, 11:50 am by William Eskridge - Guest
Hardwick (1986), which broadly rejected any privacy protections for “homosexual sodomy. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:50 am
Early booking is advised since the Hardwicke Library has limited space. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  Judge Johnson wrote the lower court opinion in Hardwick v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 2:24 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
Here’s how Judge Pregerson in Friedman defined the purpose of each work: Here, Defendant has not offered a transformative alternative use of the Photograph image. [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:42 pm by NL
Interest would run from November 2007 at the proposed rate of 2% to the trail judgment of 7 May 2009.Appeal allowed and the final order varied in these terms.Before I comment further, we should note the role of John de Waal of Hardwicke Chambers. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:10 pm
The County appealed and was slapped by the Court of Appeal in an opinion in which Justice William Bedsworth wrote, "the evidence adduced at trial obviously caused both the jury and the judge to conclude not only that something seriously wrong was done to Fogarty-Hardwick in this case, but also that the wrongful conduct was not an isolated incident. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Ronny, mentioned above, that one can be convicted of a firearm specification even if it was a co-defendant, not him, that possessed the gun, Steve Hardwick, one of the bright guys down at the state PD’s office, has an interesting counter argument:  you can’t be guilty of “complicity” to a firearm spec because the complicity statute applies only to offenses, not specifications. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 6:30 am by INFORRM
Held: the master and the judge below had been entitled to find that the claimant had not made out a case for disapplication of the normal limitation rule under the Limitation Act 1980, s 32A. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:34 am by Transplanted Lawyer
Hardwick and I was both put off by his decision to defend that particular decision, one which I thought was the least defensible in modern Supreme Court history.I was even more put off by the thunderous applause given by nearly everyone present (myself and a handful of others excepted) at those particular remarks. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:35 am by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
They were addressing the "individual mandate" — the federal law requiring private citizens to buy health insurance, which a federal judge said is beyond the reach of Congress's enumerated powers. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 9:08 pm
Hardwick, a decision he thought quite wrong but nonetheless binding.) [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 1:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
Hardwick, rejecting a challenge by homosexuals to state laws against intimate homosexual conduct. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 8:30 am by Steve Hall
Hardwick says, "It's whether what Judge Keller said and did on that day [Sept. 25, 2007] violated the Code of Judicial Conduct and the Texas Constitution. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:39 am by admin
A professional colleague of mine named Grant Moher recently spent a considerable amount of time examining the interplay between the prohibition of adultery in the Commonwealth of Virginia and the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:55 pm by Brian Huddleston
Hardwick that was truly empathetic: empathetic with the the legislators, citizens, and lawmen of Georgia who passed, supported, and enforced the anti-sodomy law that the Supreme Court upheld in that case (to take another random example that comes to mind). [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:34 am by Guest Blogger
Judging from the crowds at Camden Yards when the Sox are in town, I would say that most Baltimoreans made the same choice.Anyway, it’s a thrill to be back home, and I thank Joel Grossman very much for the invitation, which I fear he may regret after he hears what I have to say.I am going to make 4 points today. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 12:34 pm by Lawrence Solum
In which question we are not every one, to make our own private Reason, or Conscience, but the Publique Reason , that is, the reason of God's Supreme Lieutenant, Judge; and indeed we have made him Judge already, if wee have given him a Soveraign power, to doe all that is necessary for our peace and defence. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 6:54 am by Jason A. Weis, Esq.
A professional colleague of mine named Grant Moher recently spent a considerable amount of time examining the interplay between the prohibition of adultery in the Commonwealth of Virginia and the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 9:11 pm
Hardwick was inconsistent with heightened scrutiny--although that notion should have been dispelled by 1996, when the Court decided Romer. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:54 pm by Dale Carpenter
Hardwick, which had consequences far beyond the constitutional affirmation of sodomy laws. [read post]