Search for: "Judicial Watch Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss"
Results 121 - 140
of 177
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2015, 2:22 pm
While this is a win at the summary judgment (rather than the motion to dismiss) stage, it still follows the trend of courts making fair use calls rather than punting them to the fact-finder, as well as continuing the judicial good news for fair use defenses. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 3:05 am
Newman had been very closely watched. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Dec. 12, 2008)Dismissing employer's appeal from denial of Motion to Dismiss disability/failure-to-accommodate suit for lack of appellate jurisdictionCommentary on previously reported Federal Appellate Court decisions 3rd Cir. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WIPO General Assembly opens: New Director-General delivers acceptance speech (IPRoo) (IAM) (WIPO) (WIPO) (WIPO) (IPKat) (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Managing Intellectual Property) (WIPO) (IP Menu News) CAFC: 'Point of novelty' design test thrown out; the value of amicus briefs: Egyptian… [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 5:28 pm
There has been little judicial scrutiny of the FTC’s exercise of its section 5 power in the cybersecurity space. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am
The district court dismissed and the U.S. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
A visceral response along the lines of, "oh, yeah - watch me," is something we've seen a lot in preemption cases. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:36 pm
In deciding plaintiff’s motion to remand and the pharmacy defendants’ motion to dismiss, the court found that plaintiff missed the mark on the “actual knowledge” requirement:the allegations of this most artfully crafted complaint do not specify that [the pharmacy] or The Pharmacist defendants had actual knowledge of the decedent’s AVM condition. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:36 pm
In deciding plaintiff’s motion to remand and the pharmacy defendants’ motion to dismiss, the court found that plaintiff missed the mark on the “actual knowledge” requirement:the allegations of this most artfully crafted complaint do not specify that [the pharmacy] or The Pharmacist defendants had actual knowledge of the decedent’s AVM condition. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:36 pm
In deciding plaintiff’s motion to remand and the pharmacy defendants’ motion to dismiss, the court found that plaintiff missed the mark on the “actual knowledge” requirement:the allegations of this most artfully crafted complaint do not specify that [the pharmacy] or The Pharmacist defendants had actual knowledge of the decedent’s AVM condition. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:07 pm
The motion before the Master [6] The Master’s Reasons indicate that he initially approached the motion brought by KGS as if it were an “application under rule 13.05(7)” but I have not been able to find a rule bearing this number and was not referred to one by counsel. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 1:27 am
"
Judge Blasts Government's 'Baseless' Stance in Extortion Case
New York Law Journal
In a scathing decision, a New York federal judge has granted a motion to dismiss filed by a man accused of using "extortionate means" to collect extensions of credit. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am
Motion Picture Theatre Associations of Canada, et al. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika Investments Ltd,… [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 7:25 am
Leo Petronzio Landscaping, Inc., 69 Ohio St.2d 376 (1982) (“A motion to dismiss a complaint under Civ. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 1:13 am
The court on Wednesday affirmed the decisions of both lower courts in granting a motion to dismiss the claims, which were brought against E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co., the Sherwin-Williams Co., Armstrong Containers Inc. and American Cyanamid Co. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm
Wyeth, Inc. v. [read post]
