Search for: "KENNETH LORD"
Results 121 - 140
of 184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2011, 8:47 pm
At the Volokh Conspiracy, too, Kenneth Anderson adds links to his own thoughts on Targeted Killing and Drone Warfare. 18 Neither shalt thou commit adultery. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
This was essentially an intuitive judgment on principles of fairness which may change with the passage of time, in the context of a statute which creates a discretion (Lord Mustill’s guidance in R v Home Secretary, ex p. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:04 am
The UK Secretary of State for Justice, Kenneth Clarke recently released his government’s Draft Defamation Bill. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
With the release of the guidance, Kenneth Clarke, Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, announced that the Bribery Act will go into force on July 1. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:01 am
Halpern, Craig Allen Nard, Kenneth L. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:31 am
British bill of rights ‘will put judges in a difficult position’ Lord Woolf, a former senior law lord warned that a British bill of rights would complicate the position of courts, which would have to consider the two conventions when deciding cases. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
In particular, the barrister pays attention to the comments of Lord Hoffman (a former law Lord) who authored the report’s foreward. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm
The change is, apparently, being supported by Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke and the Attorney-General, Dominic Grieve. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 8:30 am
Parliament is a sausage-machine: the world according to Kenneth Clarke Afua Hirsch, writing in the Guardian, reports: The balance of power in the constitution is no joke, but it’s still hard to take the lord chancellor seriously Watching Kenneth Clarke give evidence to the House of Lords constitutional committee this week was an almost surreal experience. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 8:57 am
Professor Lewis Elton – who I had the pleasure of doing a conference with nearly 25 years ago - makes an interesting point or two… I also found Laurie Penny’s article in The New Statesman interesting – and thought provoking…Inside the Whitehall kettle Why Lord Justice Moses should watch 12 Angry Men Louise Christian in The Guardian: The judge’s proposals on criminal trials are a dangerous attack on the jury system. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:30 am
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke has ? [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
In the words of Lord Justice Jackson, the author of the revised ‘no win, no fee’ system proposals, the maintenance of legal aid is crucial to his proposed changes to the no win, no fee system. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:58 am
… and with good timing, the Lord Chief Justice has given a speech on jury trials to the Judicial Studies Board. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:36 pm
Richard Epstein, Anthony Sebok, Paul Rubin, Laurel Terry, and Susan Lorde Martin take part. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:37 am
Innes v Information Commissioner QBD (Admin) – Kenneth Parker J, 1 Nov 2010. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 5:30 pm
Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson). [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 9:29 am
Kenneth Clarke and Lord Judge: a plain-speaking verdict on life after cuts Joshua Rozenberg in The Guardian: Lord chancellor and lord chief justice share a talent for bluntness, but who is the most realistic about how the deficit will affect the legal system? [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 2:52 am
“Lord chancellor and lord chief justice share a talent for bluntness, but who is the most realistic about how the deficit will affect the legal system? [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:51 pm
Two weeks ago, I posted these ruminations in response to Human Rights Watch’s Executive Director Kenneth Roth’s proposal to use U.S. military force to bring the leader of the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) to justice. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 2:20 am
Lord Hutton, who conducted the inquiry into Dr Kelly’s death, ruled that the report should remain secret for 70 years, but there were a number of calls for another examination of the case. [read post]