Search for: "KERR v. SMITH" Results 121 - 140 of 205
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2012, 1:58 pm by Joshua Matz
” Wired reports on Bowman v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by Conor McEvily
”  At this blog Lyle discusses American Tradition Partnership. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:45 pm by Orin Kerr
” Other scholars had views that fell somewhere in between those of Kerr and Smith. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:56 pm by Ruth Levor
United States: The government fared much better than everyone realizes SCOTUS Blog: Lyle Denniston, Opinion Recap Tight Limit on Police GPS Use NY Times: Adam Liptak, Justices Say GPS Tracker Violated Privacy Rights Volokh Conspiracy Blog: Orin Kerr, What Jones Does Not Hold Concurring Opinions Blog: Derek Bambauer, Why Scalia is Right in Jones: Magic Places and One-Way Ratchets Concurring Opinions Blog: Priscilla Smith, United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:42 pm by nflatow
 Since the Court decided Katz v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:26 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) A recent decision of the District of New Mexico, United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:48 am by Sam Morris, Olswang LLP
The appeal was heard and will be considered by Lady Hale and Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown, Mance, Kerr and Wilson. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Joshua Matz
Millender (which Michael Smith previewed for this blog and Orin Kerr also analyzed), it will address police immunity for carrying out overbroad search warrants. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:30 am by Kali Borkoski
Michael Smith  previewed the case for us, and Orin Kerr provided additional background and analysis. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 2:35 am by SHG
In light of the issues presented by United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 6:34 am by Marc DeGirolami
  And in this useful summary of the recent oral argument in United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:26 am by Kiran Bhat
Finally, coverage of the Court’s aggressive questioning during Tuesday’s arguments in the prosecutorial misconduct case Smith v. [read post]