Search for: "KEYS v. PONDER" Results 121 - 140 of 190
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
In writing my testimony for today’s House Judiciary Committee hearing on drones and targeted killing of U.S. citizens overseas, I found myself writing a more complete explication of the essential legal rationale underlying the administration’s position on the subject than I have, to date, set down in one place. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 9:24 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Other appeals courts are pondering the question as more than forty lawsuits challenging the mandate go forward. [read post]
31 May 2012, 8:33 am by Lyle Denniston
   The benefits at issue are keyed to legal marriages. [read post]
10 May 2012, 1:27 pm
Dr F notes that, ironically, "[v]oluntary guidelines generally do not command attention. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
Sutton of Columbus, Ohio, nevertheless laid down a challenge for the Supreme Court to ponder when the controversy reached that level. “The Court,” he wrote, “should stop saying that a meaningful limit on Congress’s commerce powers exists or prove that it is so.”  It is fairly easy to argue (though some do debate it) that the individual mandate is a proper policy initiative to test whether there is such a limit, because of its unique nature and… [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:36 am by Ron
Thankfully, this column was brought to my attention and there is much here to ponder. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
   The application, Tennant, et al., v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 8:16 pm by Lara
Trademark Ownership Showdown Skee-Ball accuses Brewskee-Ball of cheating (ala trademark infringement) In & Out Infringement Trademark Attorney Ponders Parody — Yankees v Evil Enterprises [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
  As the Supreme Court put it in a 1984 decision (Bob Jones University v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  And a key issue before the Justices, in the case of U.S. v. [read post]