Search for: "KLEIN V. STATE" Results 121 - 140 of 841
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2022, 5:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
That the Kleins may do something in the future is not sufficient to state actual damages nor does it show that plaintiff was negligent (Kahan Jewelry Corp. v Rosenfeld, 295 AD2d 261, 261, 744 NYS2d 664 (Mem) [1st Dept 2002] [finding that pending foreclosure actions meant plaintiffs had not yet sustained any actual damages]). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 11:36 am by Katherine Pompilio
Kurup posted the unanimous court decision in FBI v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 7:11 am by Eric Goldman
Klein * 9th Circuit Sides With Fair Use in Dancing Baby Takedown Case–Lenz v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 6:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the plaintiff’s conclusory allegations were insufficient to state a cause of action alleging violation of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Klein v Rieff, 135 AD3d 910, 912 [2016]; Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 759 [2014]). [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 10:30 am by David Klein
Attorney Advertising Photo by Wesley Tingey on Unsplash Similar Blog Posts: Trademark Law: Online Retailers and Secondary Liability Trademark Infringement: Universities v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm by Eric Goldman
As a double-insult, 512(f) preempts related state law claims over abusive takedown notices, so it actually leaves victims worse off than if 512(f) didn’t exist by clearing out the field. [read post]