Search for: "Keenan v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 268
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2012, 2:08 pm
Keenan established this trial schedule for 2012: Boles v. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 2:29 pm
In UMG v. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 12:00 pm
Davis and People v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:17 pm
The story covers oral argument in Minneci v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 8:03 am
Mandel (1972), or Kerry v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 11:00 am
Judge Keenan urges the Supreme Court to address this issue. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 4:11 pm
(See People v Dailey.) [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 4:11 pm
(See People v Dailey.) [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 12:27 pm
In People v Cummings, police stopped a van driver because a check on the van’s expired license plate revealed that the owner had an outstanding arrest warrant. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 6:54 pm
These types of charges are extraordinarily easy for the state to prove. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 11:25 am
A recent Illinois appellate case, People v Thomas, expressed reservations about this type of “setup” procedure, but the court felt bound by existing Illinois State Supreme Court law. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:51 am
However in a recent ruling of US v Larson, US 4th Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Barbara Milano Keenan overturned a jury conviction for violating, and conspiring to violate, the animal fighting prohibition of the Animal Welfare Act, 7 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 10:30 am
Reference: People v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 11:59 am
In People v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 3:02 pm
See Navarette v California. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 7:30 pm
It Depends on who’s Doing the Forcing Reference: People v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 9:45 am
See People v Chiaravalle.) [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:51 pm
In Rodriguez v United States, the Court stated that the general mission of a traffic stop was to insure traffic safety. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 2:08 pm
In a recent Illinois decision, People v Acevedo, the defendant petitioned to overturn the suspension (known as the statutory summary suspension). [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 10:23 am
In People v Swift, a defendant convicted of Aggravated DUI alleged that the indictment omitted the element that his conduct proximately caused the victim’s injuries. [read post]
