Search for: "Kent Scheidegger"
Results 121 - 140
of 625
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2017, 4:21 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger welcomes the prospect of free public access to filings, noting that “[i]n the lower federal courts, public documents are available only by payment of a fee that has little relation to the cost of providing the service. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 4:43 am
Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on yesterday’s execution of an Ohio death-row inmate, carried out after the Supreme Court denied the inmate’s petition for a stay, in which the inmate had challenged the state’s lethal-injection protocol; he argues that “[w]e spend far too much in time and resources litigating issues that have nothing to do with guilt,” and that “[w]here the underlying offense is one for which death… [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:20 pm
You might want to try Kent Scheidegger at the CJLF in Sacramento. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:11 pm
Kent Scheidegger is the legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am
” Kent Scheidegger looks at the decision at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger notes that the “theme out of the United States Supreme Court [yesterday was] materiality. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:20 am
’” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger considers Monday’s decision in Ziglar v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 3:26 pm
" Not so, said CJLF Legal Director Kent Scheidegger, who told the reporter that the measure would actually relieve the Supreme Court of part of its capital workload by having initial hearings in the trial courts, where frivolous claims could be flushed out. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:35 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger comments on the execution last week of Alabama death-row inmate Thomas Arthur, who had “filed a last-minute petition in the U.S. [read post]
16 May 2017, 3:45 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger surveys the criminal cases awaiting decision at the court. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
” Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses Monday’s argument in McWilliams v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 9:58 pm
Due in great part to the work of CJLF and Kent Scheidegger in particular, six months ago the voters in very blue California rejected a referendum to abolish the death penalty. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:03 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger takes issue with the dissents from the decision to deny the stay by Justices Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor here and here, respectively. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 10:44 am
Media Bias Against the Death Penalty: Sacramento Bee editorialist Foon Rhee penned this column on the death penalty in California after communicating with CJLF Legal Director Kent Scheidegger yesterday. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 2:17 pm
Additional early commentary comes from Ross Barkan for The Guardian, Jonathan Adler for The Volokh Conspiracy at The Washington Post, Rick Hasen for his Election Law Blog, Ilya Shapiro and Roger Pilon for Cato at Liberty, Ramesh Ponnuru for National Review, Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern for Slate, Kent Scheidegger for his Crime and Consequences blog, Ian Millhiser with two posts for Think Progress, Andrew Prokop for Vox, Charles Pierce for Esquire, Ivan Eland for The… [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am
Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, who argues that the critical question in the case “was whether private organizations with pro-defendant agendas … have the power to amend the Eighth Amendment so that states must follow their latest pronouncements, rather than their previous pronouncements, in deciding who qualifies for the no-matter-what exemption,” and that on “this essential point the Court hands us a bowl of… [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am
Commentary comes from William Marshall at ACS Blog, Mark Kende at ACS Blog, Ken Jost at Jost on Justice, Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, Allen Ides in The Sacramento Bee, Amy Vitale in an op-ed at The Hill, Jeffrey Toobin in The New Yorker, the editorial board of the Los Angeles Times, Stephen Henderson in the Detroit Free Press, William Astore in The Huffington Post, Tony May in an op-ed for Penn Live, Philip Martin in an op-ed at ArkansasOnline, Paul Rosenberg at… [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 11:06 am
Federal Judicial Appointments: While partisan battles swirl around the President's nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, as noted by Kent Scheidegger in a recent post, appointments to federal district courts and courts of appeal are also of great importance. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 4:40 am
” Commentary on the appointment comes from Christina Cauterucci at Slate’s XX Factor blog, who looks at what Gorsuch’s nomination means for women, arguing that as “far as the health, safety, and civil rights of America’s women are concerned, it’s hard to imagine how the court could do worse”; Ilya Shapiro at the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, who maintains that “Donald Trump has managed to pick a nominee who should please everyone other… [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 4:21 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger looks at the four criminal cases among the new grants. [read post]
