Search for: "Kentucky Judicial Branch" Results 121 - 140 of 175
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
One is that courts would be in the position of accusing co-equal branches of pretext and dishonesty (or at the very least unawareness of their own true motivation), and that can create friction between the branches. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm by Josh Blackman
Yet, these provisions have remained in effect for over half a century, without raising any judicial doubts. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:16 am by Mark A. Graber
Garrett Davis of Kentucky referred to “the portion of the people who choose the officers of the government. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am by John Elwood
NAACP, 18-588 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’ decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am by Andrew Hamm
” On the other hand, Adam Peck writes for ThinkProgress that “already anti-women activists are plotting how best to take advantage of a weakened judicial branch in order to undermine access to safe abortions. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
” Such an alteration in the respective powers of the judicial and legislative branches, says the court, would profoundly change the “scheme” of government so as to be a revision.Perhaps the seminal California Supreme Court case on the revision/amendment line is Raven v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am by Christa Culver
ShepardDocket: 10-425Issue(s): Whether various canons of the Indiana Code of Judicial Conduct that restrict speech and/or activities of state judges and judicial candidates violate the Constitution.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (7th Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' reply Title: Al-Odah v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
Kentucky: After Democratic Kickback Scheme, State Lawmaker Pushes for Ethics BillLouisville Courier-Journal – Tom Loftus | Published: 2/5/2019 The bribery, kickbacks, and illegal campaign money revealed in the federal convictions of political operatives Tim Longmeyer and Jim Sullivan demand the General Assembly strengthen laws over those who lobby the state’s executive agencies, Kentucky Senate President Robert Stivers said. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 12:00 am
The move will make Bank of America the largest mortgage lender in the U.S., adding 1,000 Countrywide field offices to its 6,100-branch network. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
Canellos published a new biography of Harlan, The Great Dissenter: The Story of John Marshall Harlan, America’s Judicial Hero. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am by Quinta Jurecic
Ought policymakers in the executive branch take tweets from both accounts seriously as guidance, or only from the one? [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:21 am
It was also about judicial triumphalism, lawyers trying to get courts to step in and ban products that the other branches of government had determined should be legal.Let's see, Hamilton was a unanimous decision by the state's highest court. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Mark A. Graber
Executive and judicial branch officials in the decade before the Civil War insisted that persons who prevented government officials from implementing the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 were “levying war”—that is, committing treason—against the United States. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
The petitioners are two Kentucky death-row inmates. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
It is illegal under federal law for anyone in the executive branch, with a few narrow exceptions, to request the IRS conduct an audit of someone’s taxes. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The Supreme Court is the only court in the country that is not required to abide by a judicial code of ethics. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
John Elwood previews February’s likely relists. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:57 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
”  The provision may well contravene constitutional principles of Separation of Powers, insofar as it permits final judicial determinations of a patent’s validity to be overruled by an executive branch agency. [read post]