Search for: "Key v. Richardson" Results 121 - 140 of 232
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2021, 4:01 am by Administrator
In ascertaining whether a decision is one of core policy, the key focus is always on the nature of the decision. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm by Giles Peaker
In Marreco v Richardson (1908) 2 KB 584, the Court of Appeal had found In other words, if a man pays his tailor’s bill by cheque and the cheque is accepted as payment, the tailor cannot sue for his account until the cheque has been presented and dishonoured. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
(Hat tip: HobbySpace)Space race v. auctioning: Sam "big advocate of space property rights" Dinkin replies to Prof. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 11:10 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The US Department of Labor (DOL) is appealing the November 22 Nevada v US Department of Labor ruling preliminarily enjoining DOL from implementing or enforcing a modification to the DOL Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) White Collar Exemption Regulations that would have nearly doubled the minimum salary that an employer must pay an employee on a salaried basis in reliance on the White Collar Exemption. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
This point has not yet been addressed in any reported decision in England and Wales and was left open by Mr Justice Warby in Richardson v Facebook [2015] EWHC 3154 (at [59]). [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:12 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Emotional distress damages are not recoverable in a private action to enforce the disability discrimination and accommodation requirements of either the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehab Act”) or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) according to the May 1, 2022 United States Supreme Court ruling in Cummings v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 8:29 am by Richard Hunt
Again, the key strategic decision in ADA litigation must be made as soon as the suit is served. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 22 June 2016, Sir David Eady heard applications in the case of Richardson v Google UK Ltd. [read post]