Search for: "Kimbrough v. Kimbrough"
Results 121 - 140
of 340
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2009, 6:50 am
In Kimbrough v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 8:12 am
Of course, as Judge Ambro notes, "the Supreme Court is on the cusp of deciding the very issue Ricks presents - the effect of the crack/powder cocaine differential in sentencing under a now-advisory scheme," in Kimbrough v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 8:34 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 12:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 6:36 am
U.S. v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 1:24 pm
Bataillon in US v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:24 am
(emphasis added.)Further, in Gall v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 8:26 pm
Today in a thoughtful separate opinion concurring in the denial of en banc review in US v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
U.S., No. 07-10689 Sentence for possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute is reversed and the case remanded where the district court's statements during sentencing showed that it did not think it had the discretion, which was later upheld by the Supreme Court in Kimbrough v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 7:15 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the decision in Kimbrough v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 6:16 am
This distinction reminds me of nothing so much as the argument that when Monica Lewinsky performed oral sex on Bill Clinton, she had sex but he didn't.2) In Kimbrough v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 4:08 am
Ct. 2456 (2007) and Kimbrough v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:22 pm
In United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 10:22 am
Kimbrough v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 6:17 pm
See United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 10:04 am
U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 7:38 am
It agreed to hear that issue in Kimbrough v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:31 am
United States v. [read post]
1 May 2011, 10:42 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 8:45 am
United States v. [read post]
