Search for: "King v. G "
Results 121 - 140
of 608
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2023, 1:48 pm
The Supreme Court of Kings County recently found, in G-Builders/F-Int. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 12:37 pm
King, et al. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 11:35 am
G (requiring meeting with BIT members "to get to the bottom of your many conflicts and the allegations you assert in them") with Miller v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:34 am
Dubyak, Samuel G. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:29 pm
The plaintiff, Ruth Hickey, is the partner of David Agnew, the former husband of Adele King (better known as “Twink“), a popular Irish entertainer. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 7:08 am
* * * *The Supreme Court explained, in the second of its ACA cases (King v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:36 am
By James G. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:01 am
Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; King Tower Realty Corp. v G & G Funding Corp., 163 AD3d 541 [2d Dept. 2018]). [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:06 am
After the Unwired Planet v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 8:32 am
(Indeed, the only prior 512(f) lawsuit based on a 512(g) counternotice I can recall is the Shropshire v. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 10:42 am
I urge you to consider Eichmann v. the People “I was just doing my job” is no defence. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 10:42 am
I urge you to consider Eichmann v. the People “I was just doing my job” is no defence. [read post]
16 May 2007, 1:19 am
N&G Luggages Inc. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 1:39 am
Mary G. [read post]
15 May 2007, 2:45 am
Palazzo KINGS COUNTYLandlord/Tenant LawDefendants Granted Extension to Move or Answer, Directed to Pay for Use, Occupancy of Premises Pacific Carlton Development Corp. v. 752 Pacific LLC KINGS COUNTYCriminal PracticeAutomobile Presumption Inapplicable Theory For Defendant's Alleged Marijuana Possession People v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 1:12 am
Ricardo Jimenez KINGS COUNTY Real Property A/C Units Do Not Lessen Right of Way; Servient Landowner Not Required to Remove Encroachment Guzzone v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 4:36 am
However, “[t]he continuous representation doctrine serves to toll the statute of limitations and render timely an otherwise time-barred cause of action for legal malpractice, but ‘only where there is a mutual understanding of the need for further representation on the specific subject matter underlying the malpractice claim’ ” (King Tower Realty Corp. v G & G Funding Corp., 163 AD3d 541, 543 [2018], quoting McCoy v… [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 4:18 am
However, “[t]he continuous representation doctrine serves to toll the statute of limitations and render timely an otherwise time-barred cause of action for legal malpractice, but only where there is a mutual understanding of the need for further representation on the specific subject matter underlying the malpractice claim'” (King Tower Realty Corp. v G & G Funding Corp., 163 AD3d 541, 543, quoting McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d at… [read post]
18 May 2016, 11:06 am
IMS Health, Inc. and Reed v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:50 am
Chief Justice John G. [read post]
