Search for: "King v. United States Government"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2014, 7:58 am
There was, perhaps, some room for argument about what "subject to" meant, but the court cleared that up yesterday in King v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:12 pm
United States, 425 F. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 5:19 am
United States, 7 F.2d 259, 263 (2d Cir. 1925). [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:46 am
United States and Rita v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
V. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 2:28 pm
” United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:22 am
Date: Wednesday, December 8 Time: 2:00 – 3:30 PM ET Location: National Press Club’s Murrow Room. 529 14th Street NW, Washington, DC 20045 The panel follows Supreme Court arguments of Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 11:58 am
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company will never get the press scrutiny of King v. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 2:31 am
The decision in Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) clarifies the application of the statutory defence of honest opinion under section 3 of the Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:52 am
Sure issued his decision in Regan v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
In the British system, "all the king's subjects" could be impeached, including private citizens. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign… [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
She will also consider how government, principally through its courts in the United States, then develops rules for dealing with conflicts of hierarchy among legal systems when more than one appear to apply to the resolution of a dispute. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 7:15 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 3:48 am
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:30 am
Barbour, a Virginia lawyer, participated in America’s transition from a mostly republican government to a truer majority democracy, notably while serving as the twelfth Speaker of the United States House of Representatives and later as an associate justice of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:45 am
The Montana decision goes into great detail about how out of state corporations and "copper kings" would buy and sell the government through expenditures. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 5:31 am
United States — federal court authority to require the government to transfer guns seized from an individual without a legal right to have a gun Tibble v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 5:15 am
This Blog tries, when the opportunity is presented, to shed light on corporate governance practices from other countries that vary from those in the United States. [read post]
