Search for: "Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co." Results 121 - 140 of 178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2018, 4:30 am by Robert Loeb, Sarah Grant
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. held that the ATS was not intended to be extraterritorial, and that common law actions brought under the statute for violations of the law of nations occurring abroad were barred. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:24 pm by Sophia Cope
This conclusion is consistent with the Supreme Court’s ruling in Kiobel v. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 6:00 am by An Hertogen
First, the US Supreme Court hearings in Kiobel v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 7:33 am by Joy Waltemath
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. barred this claim because it was an extraterritorial application of federal law against them. [read post]
3 May 2013, 12:57 pm by Kedar Bhatia
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., which was decided in 198 days. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 9:25 am by Lyle Denniston
Royal Dutch Petroleum — right of aliens to sue corporations under the Alien Tort Statute for human rights violations overseas 11-88 — Mohamad v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 2:34 pm by John Elwood
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., the Supreme Court granted certiorari to consider whether the act allows lawsuits against corporations, after the U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Sharon Bradford Franklin
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., requires a finding that Section 2703(a) applies only within the United States. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 11:43 am by Stephen Wermiel
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., the issue is the meaning of the Alien Tort Statute (ATS). [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:30 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., in which, as IntLawGrrls have discussed in posts available here, a panel of the U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 6:26 am by Joe Consumer
On September 17, 2010, a two-judge majority of the Second Circuit held in Kiobel v. [read post]