Search for: "Kitchen v. Kitchen" Results 121 - 140 of 1,905
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2015, 9:49 pm by Patent Docs
While a line of Federal Circuit cases has established that negative limitations are acceptable in some situations, there still is a wide gap between claiming "a binary value that is not zero" versus "a kitchen utensil that is not a fork. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 5:25 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Morocho v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 7:59 am by Roger Hughes
On November 11, 2014, the California Supreme Court rejected the recent California Court of Appeals decision Golden State Boring & Pipe Jacking, Inc. v Eastern Municipal Water District,… [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 9:03 pm by News Desk
Campylobacter is a reportable disease and officials were contacted on Aug. 26 to investigate the incident with the help of infection control experts from Värmland and Livsmedelsverket (Swedish Food Agency). [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 2:45 am
The goods and services were set out for each class: for Class 21 the application covered kitchen utensils and household and kitchen equipment made of glass, porcelain, non-precious metals, plastic and earthenware. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 10:09 pm
Desire2Learn, which has its headquarters in Kitchener, Ontario argued invalidity and unenforceability (inequitable conduct).One commenter at Chronicle of Higher Education wrote:I work in the elearning group at a large university that uses Blackboard. [read post]