Search for: "Knopf v. Knopf" Results 121 - 133 of 133
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2008, 10:35 pm
A good post from Howard Knopf bringing everyone up to speed on the lack of transparency at Access Copyright, brought to the fore by the recent action of the League of Canadian Poets. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
: (GenericsWeb), Europe: New EBA referral T 1319/04 regarding patentability of known medicament for new treatment of same illness: (IPKat), Europe: Patentability of biotechnology in Europe: (IAM), Europe: New EPO Enlarged Board case referrals: T1319/04 Dosage Regimen, T1242/06 Essential Biological Process: (Hal Wegner), Thailand: Compulsory licensing: Affordable health for Thailand thanks to Matrix Labs: (Spicy IP), Thailand: European Parliament set to reprimand Mandelson for… [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 9:46 am
Then Howard Knopf (who was involved in the case), Michael Geist and David Canton all blogged about it. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 10:51 am
Special thanks to Howard Knopf for information regarding this case. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 3:50 pm
In the meantime, let CCH v Law Society of Upper Canada be your epitaph. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 9:56 pm
Rien de plus donc, si ce n'est, le doute que les juges tranchent véritablement sur la qualité du consentement électronique. [read post]