Search for: "L.R." Results 121 - 140 of 282
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm by Giles Peaker
An attempt by Ms F to argue that the rule in Rylands v Fletcher (1866) L.R. 1 Exch. 265 applied giving rise to a strict liability on CHA was quickly dealt withThe use in question must therefore be extraordinary and unusual in contrast to, [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm by Giles Peaker
An attempt by Ms F to argue that the rule in Rylands v Fletcher (1866) L.R. 1 Exch. 265 applied giving rise to a strict liability on CHA was quickly dealt withThe use in question must therefore be extraordinary and unusual in contrast to, [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 6:08 pm
Perhaps the most controversial provision of British Columbia’s new Wills, Estates and Succession Act coming into effect on March 31, 2014, is section 58 which will allow the Court to give effect as a will to a document, or an electronic record, that does not meet the formal criteria for a valid will in British Columbia, if the Court is satisfied that it represents the “testamentary intentions of a deceased person. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:10 am by Alice Woolley
L.R. (5th) 1, 2011 ABCA 94 at paras 23-29; leave to SCC denied, [2011] SCCA No. 260 (QL). [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 4:00 am by Camille Nelson
Song Richardson & Phillip Atiba Goff, Self-Defense and the Suspicion Heuristic, 98 Iowa L.R. 293 (2012). [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 4:00 am by Camille Nelson
Song Richardson & Phillip Atiba Goff, Self-Defense and the Suspicion Heuristic, 98 Iowa L.R. 293 (2012). [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 12:50 pm by Woodrow Pollack
 (NOTE: In my defense, that joint motion that I filed years ago did indicate that filings under seal would only be done according to local rule, but we revised the motion when we refiled it to explicitly incorporate the provisions of L.R. 1.09.) [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:22 am by Benjamin Jackson
Holman, The Impact of Human Gene Patents on Innovation and Access: A Survey of Human Gene Patent Litigation, 76 UKMC L.R. 295, 300 (2006). [read post]
1 May 2013, 12:43 pm by Cathy
The hearing involving Prenda Law that I described in the previous post soon resulted in a ruling, which I again summarized on Popehat. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:47 pm by Ken White
Last week we invited Cathy Gellis to guest-post her observations of a hearing in AF Holdings v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:47 pm by Cathy Gellis
Last week we invited Cathy Gellis to guest-post her observations of a hearing in AF Holdings v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:07 pm
Goodfellow (1870), L.R. 5 Q.B. 549 a case frequently cited by Canadian courts on capacity to make a will (I wrote a post on the Banks case here). [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 5:56 am
The rules which have been amended are L.R. 1-1, L.R. 5-3, L.R. 6-1, L.R. 16-1, L.R. 83-6.7, L.Cr.R. 47-2, L.Cr.R. 47-3 and Local Patent Rules LPR 1-1 through 6-1. [read post]