Search for: "LEAK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
Results 121 - 140
of 213
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm
Similarly, the United States Congress is elected by American voters. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
We also know that the President (the chief law enforcement officer of the United States) announced last February that there has not been a “smidgen of corruption” even though neither he nor the Department of Justice could have examined all the evidence, in particular the emails and other electronic information. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:44 pm
Moreover, Peter Bergen and a team at the New America Foundation dug into the government’s claims about plots in America, including studying over 225 individuals recruited by al Qaeda and similar groups in the United States and charged with terrorism, and concluded: Our review of the government’s claims about the role that NSA "bulk" surveillance of phone and email communications records has had in keeping the United… [read post]
5 May 2014, 11:37 am
The interim president of Ukraine, Oleksandr V. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:32 pm
As we have seen over the last year, the bulk collection of citizens’ phone records has driven a national debate about the proper role of surveillance in the United States. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
And much Internet traffic between two foreign countries often passes through the United States. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:22 pm
” Next up is likelihood of success on the merits: Judge Leon reviews the metadata program through the prism of a subjective expectation of privacy (think Katz), rather than a physical intrusion (United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:00 am
(SSCI report p.5-6) In August 2007, Congress enacted the Protect America Act of 2007, an interim law. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
Campaign Finance: The Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
Dennis Crouch, of the ancient and venerable Patently-O blog, writes about a bit of international procedural wrangling that threatens to open a very big leak in the U.S. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 7:00 am
The other was a Brookings book event about Matt Apuzzo’s latest writing: Enemies Within: Inside the NYPD’s Secret Spying Unit and bin Laden’s Final Plot Against America. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 7:00 am
Wells was up to Fort Meade, covering this week’s hearings in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 5:25 am
Supreme Court case in this area, Branzburg v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
The General Perjury Statute (18 USC 1621) has been nicely encapsulated in United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 5:48 am
,' that was really just a mike check for the Obama administration," joked Perry, who drew a standing ovation.He called the federal government's secret surveillance into America's phone records a "fundamental misuse of the massive power of the federal government," and added, "These acts are something I would expect to see out of China but not out of the United States." [read post]
18 May 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/ON5e4Dgt2y -> New anti-spam laws aimed at safer online world http://t.co/4KVM3vv5BL -> Organisations using privacy policies 'to protect themselves', says ICO http://t.co/ZEydJ1rB4U -> ASCAP President Paul Williams’ “State Of The Union” To Songwriters! [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:05 pm
Question: You are on record as being a staunch defender of the holding in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 5:30 am
LTD., – Google Scholar http://t.co/4KwsW69bhV -> A Letter from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to the United States Supreme Court (nice try) http://t.co/kwUCmsxOkN -> Cloud Computing and Data Residency Laws http://t.co/pNlfT5tBa6 -> Aereo Asks Judge to Dismiss TV Networks' Copyright Suit – Bloomberg http://t.co/bH4ulz93NS -> 3D printer revolution http://t.co/ZpgBtY4pcz -> UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of… [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm
., Peterson v. [read post]
