Search for: "LITTLE v. SUPERIOR COURT" Results 121 - 140 of 2,088
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2010, 1:52 pm by Greg May
Image via Wikipedia The Supreme Court denied review today in Burlage v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 12:35 pm by Maurice W. McLaughlin
The Appellate Division of the Superior Court recently issued an opinion on New Jersey employment law discussing the nature of sexual harassment and when a tort claim notice must be served in the employment context. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:00 pm
Superior Court (2001) 94 Cal.App.4th 963, 973) and expressly limits its reach to convicted defendants, I concur in the result. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 6:17 am
The trial court granted B of A's motion for judgment on the pleadings, and the plaintiff appealed.The Court of Appeal held: (1) As held in McCoy v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 11:22 am
But the Court of Appeal correctly notes that the privilege is broader than that, and includes -- pursuant to, inter alia, Section 952 of the Evidence Code -- discussions between others as well.It takes a tiny, tiny bit of a stretch of the statutory language to hold that client-client documents like the ones at issue here may well be privileged, but I think that's nonetheless clearly the right rule.Stylistically, by the way, I think that Justice Epstein went a little overboard… [read post]
10 May 2007, 1:29 pm
So I think that Justice Blease is correct to remand both of these cases, where it seems like the lower court has required the showing of a special mental deficiency as a prerequisite to any claim of incompetency. [read post]
26 May 2020, 9:35 am by Victoria Craig
From a parenting perspective, while the case of Douglas v Douglas, 2020 ONSC 2160 (which was heard on March 25, 2020, not long after the Superior Court of Justice and Ontario Court of Justice regular operations were initially suspended as a result of COVID-19) seemed to indicate that matters where one parent has reduced the other’s parenting time as a result of COVID-19 would not be considered urgent unless there was an existing court order, the… [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 6:36 am
Heidbreder challenged the city's decision in Lake Superior Court but lost.The decision is Heidbreder, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 6:10 pm by Garry Wise
More reading:  Defamation case involving diet doctors 'more about ego than injury' judge finds Bernstein v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 8:26 pm by Steven Siegler
A recent case from the New Jersey Superior Court should make any employee who has ever used a work computer to send or receive email from an attorney a little nervous. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
Superior Court (Hohnbaum) moves a bit closer to the light at the end of the tunnel. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:30 am by Steven G. Pearl
As to substantive unconscionability, the Court found that the arbitration clause at issue was identical to the one at issue in Little v. [read post]