Search for: "LITTLE v. TERRITORY" Results 121 - 140 of 1,347
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2023, 6:33 pm
  The boundaries of the national territory are a barrier (natural and artificial) through which the state can control the quality and quantity of interactions with foreigners and their footprint within the national territory. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 10:20 am by Ronald Mann
ShareWednesday’s argument in Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 2:40 pm by John Elwood
” That low threshold for finding “undue hardship” has been criticized over the years for offering little protection to religious observance. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
It is the parish church of the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the British Antarctic Territories Douglas, Yes. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:35 pm by Chip Merlin
Wikipedia discusses what a Kangaroo Court is: A kangaroo court is a court that ignores recognized standards of law or justice, carries little or no official standing in the territory within which it resides, and is typically convened ad hoc. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 5:55 am by Owiso Owiso
As the African Union Transitional Justice Policy (AUTJP) notes in paragraph 46(v), a fundamental benchmark for peace agreements is the inclusion of comprehensive provisions on justice, accountability, and reconciliation. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 5:56 pm by David Kopel
The 1889-90 Oklahoma and Arizona territorial laws get little weight. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 2:17 pm by Patricia Hughes
[See CTV News Story here and decision in Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]