Search for: "LOPEZ v. TEXAS" Results 121 - 140 of 257
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2015, 10:25 am by Jessica Smith
The only contrary authority that I found in the published case law is one Texas decision, that creates a split among sister courts on the issue. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
The Supreme Court's ruling in Royston v Lopez  sends a message encouraging Texas lawyers and lawfirms to do just that. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 4:50 pm by Kali Borkoski
Commentary comes from Mark Joseph Stern at Slate, German Lopez at Vox, and Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
University of Texas at Austin, 14-981, involves an Equal Protection Clause challenge to UT’s use of race in undergraduate admissions. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:56 am by Josh Blackman
Lopez considered whether Congress had the power to regulate the possession of guns in school zones. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 4:18 am by David DePaolo
Austin's employer was a non-subscriber.And the court also upheld the lower court's ruling in Seabright Insurance Co. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am by John Elwood
University of Texas at Austin. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:54 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In the Texas Lawyer (subscription or registration required), Miriam Rozen reports on last week’s decision in Commil USA v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm by John Elwood
Lopez-Valenzuela, 14-825, has been relisted as often as Ralph Nader (and Eugene V. [read post]
28 May 2015, 10:45 am by Maureen Johnston
Lopez-Valenzuela 14-825Issue: (1) Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding, contrary to this Court's decision in Demore v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am by John Elwood
University of Texas. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am by Maureen Johnston
Lopez-Valenzuela 14-825 Issue: (1) Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding, contrary to this Court’s decision in Demore v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:29 am by David DePaolo
An Appeals Panel agreed and Seabright sought judicial review; a Starr County District Court Judge granted summary judgment in favor of Maximina, and the 4th DCA upheld that decision last year.Seabright then asked the Texas Supreme Court to review - all the while, I presume, holding on to the death benefit money.Seabrights novel argument is that since the Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Leordeanu v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 10:54 am by Don Cruse
FRANCISCO (FRANK) LOPEZ, No. 13-1026 Set to be argued on March 26, 2015 In the news: Supreme Court of Texas agrees to consider whether attorney-client arbitration agreement is unconscionable (Disputing) MIRTA ZORRILLA v. [read post]