Search for: "Lady v. Smith"
Results 121 - 140
of 234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2015, 1:57 pm
"In keeping with the Hollywood Circuit'sreputation, Lady Justice is wearingan Armani robe this eveningin the sealUniversal argued that fair use was not "authorized by the law" because it is an affirmative defense that excuses otherwise infringing conduct. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 3:46 am
Smith v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Our Lady of Lake Hospital, Inc., 857 So. 2d 529, 532 (La. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm
In Courtroom 2, on Thursday 16 June 2011, the case of R v Smith will be heard by Lords Phillips, Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Collins and Lord Wilson. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 4:51 pm
On Friday 3 December 2010 an application in the case of Smith v ADVN (No.9) will be heard by Mr Justice Tugendhat Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJ [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 4:45 pm
Scotland now has four IP judges: Lord Emslie, Lady Smith, Lord Hodge and Lord Malcolm. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am
It only came to Lady Colthurst’s attention in the summer of 2011 after she carried out a Google search on her name. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 10:32 pm
In Lady Justice Smith’s additional judgment, the requirements that the property look like a residential property was, in large part, due to the conservation area in which the building was situated. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 2:30 am
The EAT took the view that both were parties to a contract and thus mutually obliged to perform their obligations, with Lady Smith (at para 87) saying; “If a party to such a contract is in material breach of one of his obligations he cannot insist that the other party perform a reciprocal term” This isn’t new law – the same principle was set out in the 2008 case of RDF v Clements all the way back to Thorneloe v McDonald &… [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:44 am
As you may have noticed from the neutral citation, this is a Scottish decision, delivered by Lady Smith in the Outer House of the Court of Session last week and accessible in full here. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
14.53: Lord Keen QC is discussing the political nature of the Smith Commission in Scotland that led to the Scotland Act and its interaction with the Sewel Convention. 14.46: Lord Keen QC names section 28.8 of the Sewel Convention as the language of “political judgement”. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
On 26 November 2019 there will be an application in the case of Kirkegaard v Smith. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
These were two of the key questions which the Court of Appeal grappled with in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
These were two of the key questions which the Court of Appeal grappled with in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 6:36 am
Pretext is one way to do that ("Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, JobCo says it fired Joe Smith because he was a bad worker. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Someone will go seriously old skool and play Cumming v Danson or Say v Smith, the quiet one in the corner will drone on about how everyone else always forgets AG Securities, there is always an argument about Bruton, but (and if there is a point to this introduction, this is it) there is now a new giant on the scene, one judgment to rule them all and in its 9 strong constitution bind them - the Supreme Court decision in Pinnock (you might like to check out our note on the… [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Someone will go seriously old skool and play Cumming v Danson or Say v Smith, the quiet one in the corner will drone on about how everyone else always forgets AG Securities, there is always an argument about Bruton, but (and if there is a point to this introduction, this is it) there is now a new giant on the scene, one judgment to rule them all and in its 9 strong constitution bind them - the Supreme Court decision in Pinnock (you might like to check out our note on the… [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 9:51 am
” Recap of Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
On the same day Julian Knowles J heard the trial in the case of Kirkegaard v Smith. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
Smith and hold that any substantial burden on religion should trigger strict scrutiny under the First Amendment. [read post]
