Search for: "Lanham v. United States of America"
Results 121 - 140
of 156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Georgia United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am
Hyundai Motor America, Inc (EDTexweblog.com) District Court S D California: False marking affirmative defenses – Laches & unclean hands are in, advice of Counsel is out: Oakley, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
Dodd, Victoria J.Durham, N.C. : Carolina Academic Press, c2010.Election LawKF4886 .K37 2010Campaign rules : a 50-state guide to campaigns and elections in America / Nina Kasniunas and Daniel M. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm
Miller, editor ; with Louis Aucoin.Washington, DC : United States Institute of Peace Press, 2010.Constitutional LawKF4930 .O75 2010The origins of the necessary and proper clause / Gary Lawson ... [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:02 am
ICG America, Inc., 2010 WL 3522982 (D. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:49 pm
Federalism by Jury in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 6:38 am
United States of America Rugby Football Union, Ltd., --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2010 WL 3553885 (D. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am
Diamond Innovations Inc (EDTexweblog.com) (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania will revisit and reconsider the standing issue in false marking case: United States of America ex rel FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 2:24 am
Rather, the loser’s recourse is to commence a de novo law suit under the national law of its jurisdiction, which in the case of the United States would be a claim under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, [specifically, §1125(d) of the Lanham Act]. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:50 am
In this case, the guy made one Lanham Act claim and one copyright claim. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
Applera Corp (Patently-O) (271 Patent Blog) District Court S D Indiana: Stay pending reexam lifted prior to issuance of reexam certificate (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: United States is not an indispensible party to false marking action: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 2:38 pm
From our colleagues Beverly Pearman and Jeremy Sacks: Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. and Mitsubishi Power Systems Americas, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(IP finance) Withdrawing patent applications – a matter of priority (IPKat) United States US General U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
Justice Stevens wrote for the majority in the Court’s 1984 5-4 opinion in Sony Corp. of America v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:06 am
: how the case of Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 2:47 pm
United States of America, Civil Action No. 09-898 (ESH), appaers at CCH Advertising Law Guide ¶63,737. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
(IP Factor) Bar Ilan University holds premature ‘After Re Bilski’ conference (IP Factor) Latin America Madrid protocol in Latin America: a nightmare or a dream? [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 8:00 am
Culliver (09-158) - originally Conference 11.6 [involves lawyers from Akin Gump and Howe & Russell] United States Defense Department v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
See, e.g., Lockheed Martin Corp. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
