Search for: "Latham v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 202
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2012, 9:07 am by INFORRM
The appeal by way of case stated in the “Twitter joke” case (Chambers v DPP) was heard on 8 February 2012 and judgment was reserved. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am by NL
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am by NL
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
5 May 2012, 4:09 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
To my knowledge, Hawaii is the only other state which has adopted the "same proof" test of preemption.Grace Hunt IT Solutions, LLC v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:43 pm by Marissa Miller
At Forbes, Peter Reilly examines the consequences of the Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 6:33 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Supreme Court in Fisher v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:39 am by Nabiha Syed
The Daily Texan reports that the University of Texas has hired the firm of Latham & Watkins to represent the University in Fisher v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:37 pm by David Lat
Thomas [Supreme Court of the United States via SCOTUSblog] Maples v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
In RSPCA (NSW) v Davies [2011] NSWSC 1445, Latham J awarded the RSPCA in NSW damages of Aus$100,000 for defamatory material posted on a website authored by retired “forensic computer detective” Mal Davies. [read post]