Search for: "Laws v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 172,722
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 7:58 pm
In Khadr v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:09 pm
In Nater v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:54 pm
The history is found at Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 3:23 pm
The court distinguished the facts from its prior decision in PPG Industries v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:07 pm
David Pozen is the Charles Keller Beekman Professor of Law at Columbia Law School. [read post]
20 May 2024, 11:52 am
If so, you might violate the antitrust laws. [read post]
20 May 2024, 11:41 am
Judge Wright puts it plainly stating that ICE's practice can be more accurately termed "knock and arrests" and "violate[s] the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
20 May 2024, 11:21 am
(Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:22 am
This week, we highlight petitions that ask the court to consider, among other things, whether Arizona’s sentencing law for juvenile offenders convicted of first-degree murder violates Miller because, although the law allows for the possibility of release, the state abolished parole for homicide in 1994. [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:44 am
Today's advance release election law opinion: Markley v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am
On May 16, 2024, the Court issued its first in a series of blockbuster administrative law decisions: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:33 am
Supreme Court in Oklahoma v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am
If U.S. actors seek to undermine the ICC process, this will diminish the United States’ credibility in invoking international law in other contexts, such as Ukraine. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:59 am
“Lawful under the circumstances in which it is provided” means that the reproductive health care is either: lawful under the circumstances in which the health care is provided and in the state in which it is provided; or protected, required, or authorized by Federal law, including the United States Constitution, regardless of the state in which such health care is provided. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:26 am
The efficient markets hypothesis is over 50 years old.Basic v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:00 am
THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED. ** Civil Service Law §72 applies to public employees in the Classified Service of the State as the employer or a political subdivision of the State [see Civil Service §40]. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:00 am
THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED. ** Civil Service Law §72 applies to public employees in the Classified Service of the State as the employer or a political subdivision of the State [see Civil Service §40]. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:01 am
This was already the question in 1996 when [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg penned the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
