Search for: "Lay v. Social Security Administration" Results 121 - 140 of 210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2024, 6:05 pm
  Since 2020, these offences have been revived from slumber to prosecute social network services administrators and users, book publishers, online media editors, and Jimmy Lai, the proprietor of Apple Daily. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am by The Legal Blog
While laying down guidelines for PILs the Supreme Court held as under;DEFINITIONS OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION27. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
WCAB panel decisions are citeable authority, particularly on issues of contemporaneous administrative construction of statutory language. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:08 pm by LindaMBeale
  AT&T Mobility v Concepcion is only the latest foray in this direction. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Zuri Blackmon
Taxpayers are entitled to a fair and impartial administrative appeal of most IRS decisions, including many penalties, and have the right to receive a written response regarding the Office of Appeals’ decision. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The process of putting in place the administrative arrangements is continuing. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
., the cloud);[28] the Snowden disclosures and resulting suspicion of U.S. surveillance practices in Europe;[29] the U.S. government’s reaction to those disclosures;[30] the increased use of encryption;[31] the rise of ISIL and recent attacks including those involving Charlie Hebdo and the French high-speed train;[32] increased surveillance authorized by new foreign laws;[33] and perhaps other aggressive counter-terrorism activities by European governments that may be at least indirectly… [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am by Charles Fried
That “fundamental” change was worked seventy-five years before by the Social Security Act and fifty years before with Medicare. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am by Josh Richman
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 12:38 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
The scuttled measure would have required social media users to save their outgoing content for a period of 90 days. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:35 pm by The Legal Blog
The reason of the rule, which makes a precedent binding lies in the desire to secure uniformity and certainty in the law.Tribhovandas Purshottamdas Thakkar v. [read post]