Search for: "Leathers v. Leathers"
Results 121 - 140
of 542
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2014, 3:19 pm
The goods in Class 18 included ‘articles of leather and imitations of leather; bags; handbags; shoulder bags; bumbags; sports bags; casual bags; briefcases; attaché cases; satchels; beauty cases; credit card cases and holders; wallets; purses; belts; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods’. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 10:10 am
DOJ Antitrust Division Head Christine Varney Offers Guidance on Leegin and Proposes "Structured Rule of Reason Test" For Evaluating RPM Under State Laws When the Supreme Court modified the prohibition against resale price maintenance agreements ("RPM") more than two years ago in Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 3:10 pm
On May 10, 2019, jurors in an Illinois federal court reached a verdict on a case filed in 2016 by Deckers against an alleged infringer for trademark and design-patent infringement: Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 12:30 pm
As yesterday’s 11th Circuit decision in Ocheesee Creamery LLC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 5:55 pm
Lois Sportswear, USA, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 2:00 pm
Whitehead v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:27 am
That's U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 1:53 pm
The Northern District of Illinois recently debated this in Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
Lots of vinyl and some leather contains lead. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:49 am
Defendants are not professionals as required for a claim for professional malpractice (see Chase Scientific Research v NIA Group, 96 NY2d 20, 28 [2001]; Starr v Fuoco Group LLP, 137 AD3d 634, 634 [1st Dept 2016]; Leather v United States Trust Co. of N. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 9:00 pm
And here it is, right before my eyes, one of the great inflection points of the (early) civil rights movement--Brown v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 11:13 am
Hord v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 11:13 am
Hord v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 12:59 pm
This question was recently answered in a judgment of the CJEU in Case C-183/21 (Globus v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Sometimes elegance is refusal.The average consumer and the nature of the purchasing actAs per Sabel BV v Puma AG, the average consumer normally perceives a trade mark as a whole and does not proceed to analyse the various details. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 2:54 am
Tung V. [read post]
16 May 2010, 4:35 pm
Fendi Adele S.R.L. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 3:02 am
March 21, 2013 - 2 PM: Gado S.r.L. v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 2:02 pm
Bottega Veneta Int'l, S.A.R.L. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 6:33 am
Co., Ltd., 254 NY 111, 114 [1930]) and six months (Continental Leather Co. v Liverpool, Brazil & Riv. [read post]
