Search for: "Leathers v. Leathers" Results 121 - 140 of 540
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2014, 3:19 pm
The goods in Class 18 included ‘articles of leather and imitations of leather; bags; handbags; shoulder bags; bumbags; sports bags; casual bags; briefcases; attaché cases; satchels; beauty cases; credit card cases and holders; wallets; purses; belts; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods’. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 10:10 am by Sheppard Mullin
DOJ Antitrust Division Head Christine Varney Offers Guidance on Leegin and Proposes "Structured Rule of Reason Test" For Evaluating RPM Under State Laws When the Supreme Court modified the prohibition against resale price maintenance agreements ("RPM") more than two years ago in Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 3:10 pm by Marina Chafa
On May 10, 2019, jurors in an Illinois federal court reached a verdict on a case filed in 2016 by Deckers against an alleged infringer for trademark and design-patent infringement: Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 12:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
As yesterday’s 11th Circuit decision in Ocheesee Creamery LLC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 1:53 pm by Richa Srivastava
The Northern District of Illinois recently debated this in Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:00 am by Bruce Nye
  Lots of vinyl and some leather contains lead. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendants are not professionals as required for a claim for professional malpractice (see Chase Scientific Research v NIA Group, 96 NY2d 20, 28 [2001]; Starr v Fuoco Group LLP, 137 AD3d 634, 634 [1st Dept 2016]; Leather v United States Trust Co. of N. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 9:00 pm by Buce
And here it is, right before my eyes, one of the great inflection points of the (early) civil rights movement--Brown v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 12:59 pm by Giorgio Luceri
This question was recently answered in a judgment of the CJEU in Case C-183/21 (Globus v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Sometimes elegance is refusal.The average consumer and the nature of the purchasing actAs per Sabel BV v Puma AG, the average consumer normally perceives a trade mark as a whole and does not proceed to analyse the various details. [read post]