Search for: "Lee v. Doe"
Results 121 - 140
of 3,147
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2023, 1:27 pm
The case is Heim v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 7:06 am
" The Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Lee and Perez) says this is an "appealing proposition," but it also says this is not the law.The Fair Labor Standards Act says the statute is violated when an employer "does not pay overtime wages for work it 'suffers or permits,' that is, work it requires, knows about, or should have known about. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 10:35 am
(Judge VanDyke's opinion today nowhere mentions this sentence, whereas Judge Nguyen's opinion from five years go, which reversed and remanded Pepe's original conviction, does. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
& Appliance v. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 11:42 am
Malone v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
In Doe v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:41 am
From Hakim v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Lee: The Supreme Court Case that Influenced the Play “A Raisin in the Sun. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This is no longer about figuring out the most sensible reading of statutory language; it is instead about dictating how Congress does its work. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 11:32 am
The court distinguishes Lee v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 8:20 am
(Our caselaw does not always distinguish between this offense and forcible entry and detainer.) [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 12:10 am
Wallac e v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
A: some innovation does come from Europe. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 12:53 pm
The Court of Appeals reinstates the case under the rules allowing traumatized plaintiffs to file an untimely claim.The case is Doe v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:55 am
In Katz v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 5:55 am
Tuberville disagrees with the Pentagon’s reproductive health care access policy that was issued following the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am
Last Week in the Courts On Monday 17 July 2023 Nicklin J, sitting at the Port Talbot Justice Centre, heard the case of Corey Lee Styles v South Wales Police [2023] EWHC 1835 (KB). [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:38 am
In Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 6:16 am
The fact that plaintiff's formal termination did not take place for a few months does not undermine her retaliation claim as a matter of law. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 2:05 pm
The Court of Appeals says the plaintiff was subjected to enough obnoxious, sexist, and racist comments that she can prevail at trial.The case is Zeng v. [read post]
