Search for: "Leigh v. Leigh"
Results 121 - 140
of 330
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2015, 11:09 am
General Counsel for Tiffany, Leigh Harlan, stated that “We believe this decision further validates the strength and value of the Tiffany mark and reinforces our continuing efforts to protect the brand. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 6:50 am
Should House v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 10:17 am
KokeshCase Number: 09-cv-01021 (United States District Court for the District of New Mexico)Case Filed: October 27, 2009Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 30, 2015 4/30/15 7/29/15 2015-39 SEC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 12:00 pm
In SEC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:34 am
A very cursory search on Google brought up the case of FHR v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 10:30 am
In the June 8, 2015 ruling in Hill v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:37 pm
KokeshCase Number: 09-cv-01021 (United States District Court for the District of New Mexico)Case Filed: October 27, 2009Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 30, 2015 4/30/15 7/29/15 2015-39 SEC v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 7:08 am
She said, “The trial was called the United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 10:16 am
Here are the latest four InFuse victories.Truthful v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 7:26 am
Too much water under the bridge at this point (even before we get to see what they do in King v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm
See Mohr v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:40 am
See Mohr v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 10:13 pm
Fair Use and News Reporting Guest post by Leigh Barnwell (J.D. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:29 pm
" Simcox v.. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:02 am
In Pliego v Hayes, 2014 WL 6796537 (W.D.Ky.) [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 8:16 am
Jaffee v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 11:50 am
Kristin Hickman (Minnesota) presents Treasury's Retroactivity at Miami today as part of its Legal Theory Workshop Series hosted by Leigh Osofsky: In Bowen v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 3:37 am
In Garcetti v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 11:03 am
Donohue, Leigh T. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
The PDA was necessitated by a Supreme Court decision two years earlier, General Electric v. [read post]