Search for: "Lewis v. People of The State of California"
Results 121 - 140
of 218
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
Supreme Court heard argument on the constitutionality of California's Proposition 8, which bans same-sex marriage in California, and then on the legality of the Defense of Marriage Act, a federal law prohibiting the payment of federal benefits to spouses in same-sex marriages. While the LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and ransgender) movement is gaining force, the fact is that, as of April 11, 2013, same-sex… [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am
The case is a follow-on to the similarly famous Masterpiece Cakeshop, involving a state’s ability to compel people with religious objections to same-sex marriage to use their artistic talents for such ceremonies. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 9:06 am
The first affirmative action case to be decided by the Supreme Court, Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
In his controlling opinion in the 1978 case of Regents of Univ. of California v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:42 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
Following Judge Sutton’s rejection of the “inactivity” argument, the Supreme Court can take its time
5 Aug 2011, 1:00 pm
Lopez (1995) and United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 11:09 am
Field v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am
Remember United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:47 pm
Other Superior Court judges named Wednesday are: Mark V. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:45 pm
Lewis v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 3:44 pm
On Aug. 14, a 2-1 panel of the Ninth Circuit ruled California's confiscation unconstitutional, in Duncan v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, April 17, 2009 US v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:09 pm
The Baker v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:52 pm
Supreme Court in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm
Mountain States Tel. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Question: Based on your extensive research, do you think that Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s major take-away points (beyond United States v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 1:12 pm
” [via FindLaw] People v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
In the 20th volume, Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the University of California, Berkeley School of Law, and Howard Gillman, chancellor of the University of California, Irvine, have written “The Religion Clauses: The Case for Separating Church and State,” which focuses on what the authors see as the troubling directions our conservative justices are now taking insofar as they reject the idea of a wall separating church and state. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 4:03 am
Her words echo the standard refrains that have been deployed to defend affirmative action since Justice Lewis Powell’s opinion in University of California v. [read post]
