Search for: "Li v. Holder"
Results 121 - 140
of 445
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2011, 2:39 am
Chernow Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 7:21 am
Bhd. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:08 am
/Li Chow, D2007-0695 (WIPO July 11, 2007). [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 8:29 am
LLC v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 2:01 pm
It examines the issue of effective remedies from the perspective of rights holders and proposes that remedial mechanisms should be responsive to the diverse experiences and expectations of rights holders. [read post]
23 May 2012, 7:51 pm
S’holders Litig., 789 A.2d 14 (Del. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm
Only one unreversed Supreme Court majority opinion has upheld a content-based speech restriction on strict scrutiny grounds — last year’s Holder v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:22 am
At one end of the spectrum lies perfect or near perfect correspondence. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am
Gore and Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am
Gore and Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 8:53 am
In La Salle v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 4:09 pm
Under the 1996 Broadcasting Act Ofcom is charged with making sure licence holders are “fit and proper” persons to hold the licence. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 9:37 pm
QIP Holders LLC) involving sandwich giant Subway suing rival Quiznos. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:06 am
(Many copyright owners would block all parodies, for example, and the administrative costs of finding and obtaining consent from copyright holders would frustrate many academic uses.) [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:45 am
In Kimble v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 4:36 pm
In 2013 the Supreme Court, in Shelby County v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 4:06 am
This is partly the question in Kiobel v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 7:00 pm
The Court held in 2008’s Boumediene v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 1:53 am
IPKat friend Rodolfo Bretscher reported on the case of the Swiss Federal Patent Court 2018/004 dated 22 October 2018.The Swiss caseIn the case of ViiV v. [read post]
