Search for: "Little v. North Carolina Department of Justice" Results 121 - 140 of 170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
On January 4, the court gave plenary review to the Maryland and North Carolina political-gerrymandering cases and set them for expedited briefing so they could be heard in the March sitting. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 7:52 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
District Court for the Western District of North Carolina “knocked out” the EEOC’s lawsuit against Propak Logistics, Inc. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by John Elwood
The Court apparently needs to ruminate a little longer on the S.G. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 4:00 pm
Peter posts Is Viacom a little hypocritical? [read post]
20 May 2012, 1:11 pm
Congressman Watt(D-North Carolina) Congressman Watt:  "Based on recent press accounts, technology companies seem to be engaged in a so-called patent arms race. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media Whether a request under the right to be forgotten should be extended to non-EU jurisdictions is due to be considered by the European Court of Justice, the Press Gazette reports. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:13 am by Brian Gallini
North Carolina, 564 U.S. 261, 277 (2011). [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It was this nationalistic Hamiltonian mode that found its way into the United States Reports through Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinion for the Court in McCulloch v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 6:56 am by MBettman
North Carolina, 131 S.Ct. 2394 (2011) (Age a relevant factor when determining whether an interrogation is custodial for Miranda purposes.) [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm by smtaber
Click Here LAWSUITS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS FILED North Carolina Poultry Processing Plant and Manager Indicted for Violations of Clean Water Act. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am by John Elwood
Justice Thomas (joined by Justice Scalia) was chattier. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:17 pm by Aaron Pelley
The dissent argued that the Court’s new element “makes little sense and will create confusion for trial judges and juries. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:56 pm by Jessie Canon
A unanimous Supreme Court overruled longstanding precedent established in Betts v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am by John Mikhail
”  In reply, Chief Justice Jay counseled patience and restraint: “The assumption will do its own work; it will justify itself, and not want advocates. [read post]