Search for: "Little v. Walker"
Results 121 - 140
of 538
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2022, 4:42 am
The “selection of one among several reasonable courses of action does not constitute malpractice” (Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 738), and an attorney may not be held liable for “‘the exercise of appropriate judgment that leads to an unsuccessful result'” (Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 846-847, quoting Rubinberg v Walker, 252 AD2d 466, 467). [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:54 pm
At oral argument in March, however, the EPA’s prospects looked a little bit brighter. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 6:39 am
Earlier: Charney v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Circuit Judge Laurence Silberman’s concurrence in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:35 am
Rory Little covered the case for this blog, with commentary from Leslie Shoebotham at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 6:58 am
So the re-assignment should have little impact on the litigation. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:42 pm
(Texas Department of Motor Vehicles/Handout via Reuters) So holds the Court in Thursday’s Walker v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 1:38 pm
Walker. [read post]
21 May 2019, 6:01 am
Gosden v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:53 am
Interestingly, Judge Schiller stated that the appointment of arbitrators by the parties was not sufficient to automatically toll the statute of limitations (citing with "see" signal Walker v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 12:27 pm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------LORD JUSTICE KEENEMRS JUSTICE DOBBS DBEMR JUSTICE WALKER R -v- JACK TURNER DANIEL-LANCE SAUMUELS Crown copyright ©1. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 10:42 am
Walker said the greatest baseball experiences in his life were pitchers' duels versus John E. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 8:53 am
Petroutsas, 580 F.3d 1000, 1018 (9th Cir. 2009); Walker v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 6:52 am
Walker v. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 10:23 am
I poked around a little with FastCase last night and found one case wherein it was the underlying charge, Bazemore v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 10:18 am
Second, it was a “not precedential” decision, meaning it had little, if any, precedential value. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:12 pm
In today’s case (Mavi v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 6:33 am
When people see what Judge Walker saw--and they can see for themselves the evidence we put on, and how little the proponents had to offer in defense of Proposition 8--more and more of them will agree that the Constitution does not permit this kind of discrimination. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 4:11 pm
Cairns v Modi; KC v MGN Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1382). [read post]
