Search for: "Long v. Commissioner of IRS"
Results 121 - 140
of 226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2016, 7:16 am
Ohio, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:00 pm
Memo. 2011-201, Luis Bulas, Petitioner, v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 1:31 pm
In DeMar v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 1:31 pm
In DeMar v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm
If the IRS knows that the taxpayer has obtained representation from a person authorized to practice before the IRS and the IRS knows or can easily obtain the representative’s name and address. 3. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 4:57 am
(See Kean v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 6:30 am
Practitioners have long held this view, but apparently, the IRS and Treasury wanted to correct a First Circuit decision that is nearly 30 years old. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 1:03 pm
According to the brief, Castillo did not know (despite diligent efforts to find out) that the IRS was incorrectly assessing her for tax on the earnings of a business she had long since sold. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am
Commissioner (1991). [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am
Commissioner (1991). [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 8:02 pm
Commissioner, T.C. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
Duggar v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
Duggar v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 9:13 pm
Six decades later, in the case of United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:14 am
A Ways and Means Republican has called for the resignation of IRS Commissioner Shulman to resign in the wake of the new revelations of IRS malfeasance. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 11:32 pm
Commissioner of Internal Revenue – see https://www.bolderadvocacy.org/blog/parks-case-pauses-unresolved-questions (incl the amicus brief from @AFJustice & @COF_) What is electioneering? [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:30 am
Then much hemming and hawing ensued with citations to Dixie Dairies Corp. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 5:21 am
The long and short of it is that I agree with many of your points. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 4:07 pm
Indeed, in Kennedy v Ireland [1987] IR 587, the first and leading case on privacy of communications, Hamilton P awarded the plaintiffs a total of £50,000 damages for the significant distress that they suffered from the defendants’ infringement of their constitutional right to privacy ([1987] 1 IR 587, 594-595). [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:06 pm
Commissioner. [read post]
