Search for: "Long v. Miller, et al"
Results 121 - 140
of 205
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2013, 4:04 pm
The continuing validity of Baird et al is better reserved for a case in which the receptor thresholds have actually been applied to a project. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
This post is by my colleagues Mark Schonfeld, John Sturc, Barry Goldsmith, Eric Creizman, Jennifer Colgan Halter, Akita St. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:44 am
The Regents of the University of California, et al. (2020) 51 Cal.App.5th 226. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 3:10 pm
In a recent case decided last summer, O’Bannon et al. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 3:10 pm
In a recent case decided last summer, O’Bannon et al. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 12:40 pm
City of Banning (SCC Acquisitions, Inc., et al., Real Parties in Interest) (4th Dist., Div. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
(The Court CVSG’ed in Cook after the Long Conference.) [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
Riverside Health System, et al., 2016 IL App (3d) 150445 (Oct. 6, 2016). [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
Riverside Health System, et al., 2016 IL App (3d) 150445 (Oct. 6, 2016). [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 6:33 am
Gallo Brain Damaged Child Receives $7.75 Million Settlement – Louis Montes, a minor, et al. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm
FORRESTER WINNE, et al., Plaintiffs,v.NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2005-1, et al., Defendants.No. 1:16-cv-00229-JDL.United States District Court, D. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:16 pm
City of Long Beach, et al., Xavier Becerra (Attorney General, as Intervener) v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
Thus, for instance, Liqun Cao et al, Willingness to Shoot: Public Attitudes Toward Defensive Gun Use, 27 Am J Crim Just 85, 96 (2002), reports that 35 percent of a representative sample of Cincinnati residents age 21 and above said they would not be willing to shoot a gun at an armed and threatening burglar who had broken into their home. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:37 pm
Association of Irritated Residents, et al. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:44 pm
Kern County Board of Supervisors, et al. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
In Union Pacific Railroad Company v. 174 Acres of Land,7 the court noted that the railroad company could bring a diversity action against an owner so long as the railroad is properly authorized to condemn property within the State.Discovery Fed.R.Civ.P. 26 governs discovery in federal condemnation actions, as well as other federal matters. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
Md. 2023), available at https://www.justice.gov/atr/case/usv-cargill-meat-solutions-corp-et-al. [6] United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Newport News School Bd, et al. , 2023 Va. [read post]
