Search for: "Long v. U.s.*"
Results 121 - 140
of 6,437
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2013, 3:07 am
This brave Kat ventured through the 40-page long judgment, to catch a glimpse of all the six claims analyzed in the Order. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:45 pm
The Court focused on Radio Corporation of America (RCA) v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 8:46 pm
By Josh Rich -- Patent applicants dissatisfied with final outcome of patent prosecution proceedings have long had two options for court review of a Patent and Trademark Appeal Board decision: an appeal to the Federal Circuit under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 1:32 pm
Check the U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 5:24 pm
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: Tuesday Duncan v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 9:57 pm
Over the weekend, John Papianou, class action defense lawyer and Partner at Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, sent me a copy of Long v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
The Daniel v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:38 am
Cupek v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 11:48 pm
One year earlier, in Alexander v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 3:47 pm
Case in point: in Nieto v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:35 am
Brief for Petitioner, Carpenter v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 12:38 pm
Leal Santos v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:12 pm
Therefore, it expired on February 3, 2009, long before the plaintiffs brought the action in New York state court in December 2022. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:57 am
In Cosmetic Warriors v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
SEARCH & SEIZUREUnited States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm
Sanofi Adventis v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm
Regards, Roy] Walmart v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 7:04 am
As such, it would fall under a separate set of provisions and related expedited procedures under the War Powers Resolution—provisions widely believed to be unconstitutional following the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 5:07 am
Alvarez v. 40 Mulberry Restaurant, Inc. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 9:05 am
As readers of this blog probably know by now, United States v. [read post]
