Search for: "Look v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 45,668
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2017, 1:33 pm by Andrew Hamm
” The post Panelists look back at — and in one case, personally recall — Gideon v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 10:29 am by Bill Amadeo
In what looked like an impossible hurdle to climb, the law firm of Grabel and Associates shocked the state of Michigan by winning their second decision before the Michigan Supreme Court in less than a 3-week time span when the highest court of the state overturned the “People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 8:22 am by zola.support.team
In 1977, the United States Supreme Court decided Trans World Airlines v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 7:32 am by Securites Lawprof
The SEC filed an amicus brief at the invitation of the Second Circuit in Slayton v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am by Guy Stuckey-Clarke, Olswang LLP
In November 2000, the High Court (Laws LJ and Gibbs J) gave judgment in favour of Mr Bancoult, a Chagos Islander, in granting a High Court order quashing the Immigration Ordinance 1971, s 4; see R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2001] QB 1067 (“Bancoult (1)”). [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 1:04 pm by Minick Law
This week the North Carolina Court of Appeals held in State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 3:56 pm by Norm Pattis
 My hope was to poke my head in on the trial of State v. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 4:51 am
Wednesday, 04 July 2007 A look at Ohio's lethal injection lawsuit: Andrew Welsh-Huggins has this helpful AP article, entitled "A look at Ohio's lethal injection lawsuit," with some particulars of the Cooey v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 8:39 am by Suzanne Ilene Schiller
This week, the Supreme Court of the State of Montana took a look at statute of limitations issues in the context of state law claims for trespass and nuisance in contamination cases in the case of Burley v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 10:42 am
The way it looks right now, Ohio State will finish the regular season ranked Number 1 and there will be great dissension about the team that Ohio State should play. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am by Peter Groves
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]