Search for: "Lord v. Superior Court" Results 121 - 140 of 203
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
On Wednesday 26 March 2014, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Wilson, Sumption, Carnwath and Toulson) gave judgment in the case of Kennedy v Charity Commission ([2014] UKSC 20). [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
A simple example of this would be the constant complaints that we hear about the sentences given in the courts both at the superior and magisterial levels; someone may be found guilty of causing death by dangerous driving and is made to pay a sizeable fine with a short term of imprisonment or no imprisonment at all, while another is found guilty of manslaughter for carelessly or recklessly operating a piece of heavy machinery which causes the death of another and is given a… [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
A simple example of this would be the constant complaints that we hear about the sentences given in the courts both at the superior and magisterial levels; someone may be found guilty of causing death by dangerous driving and is made to pay a sizeable fine with a short term of imprisonment or no imprisonment at all, while another is found guilty of manslaughter for carelessly or recklessly operating a piece of heavy machinery which causes the death of another and is given a… [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 1:49 am by INFORRM
  This is a rare example of a misuse of private information coming to trial in the English courts (it appears to be only the third such case since the decision of the House of Lords in Campbell). [read post]
30 May 2010, 2:08 pm by INFORRM
Lord Lester continues his energetic media campaign with an article in the Sunday Times about the Bill. [read post]
29 May 2019, 12:22 pm
  Yes, the English courts do refuse preliminary injunctions from time-to-time. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
The Data Protection and Digital Information Bill has passed through the House of Commons and will now proceed to the House of Lords for consideration. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:05 am by Rosalind English
 Coming at the question from a lawyer’s point of view, I look at the private law of nuisance and its superiority as an instrument for environmental regulation in this country. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Xavier Beauchamp-Tremblay
Before that, I did a bit of commercial litigation, mostly at the Québec Superior Court. [read post]
3 May 2018, 8:10 am by Dave
  In this decision, by different routes, the Court of Appeal has held that the House of Lords decision in R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex parte Ferdous Begum [1993] AC 509 remains good law, thus effectively putting to one side the significant developments in what I would call the governmentality of persons without capacity. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
” Merpel had just read the latest judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in the Patents Court, England and Wales, in Resolution Chemicals Limited v H Lundbeck A/S [2013] EWHC 3160 (Pat). [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 7:33 am by Greenberg Glusker
The last published court decision involving the Act was Palos Verdes Home Association v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 5:09 am by charonqc
Today, the lord chief justice, Lord Judge, master of the rolls Lord Neuberger and Lord Justice Sedley allowed Singh’s appeal, ruling that the high court judge had “erred in his approach”. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Media and Freedom of Expression Law in Other Jurisdictions On September 22, 2010, Toronto Police Constable Adam Josephs launched a lawsuit in the Ontario Superior Court: Adam Josephs v. [read post]