Search for: "Lord v. USA"
Results 121 - 140
of 190
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
Thank you for the opportunity of speaking to you on a subject that has been of great interest to me and of great importance to the peoples of the Caribbean region.I know that when many people think of the Caribbean, the immediate images of islands surrounded by sand and sea bathed in sunshine fun and frolic come to mind; that is what we see on TV By extension the exotic jungles of the South America in particular my native land Guyana , the only English speaking country on the continent of South… [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
Thank you for the opportunity of speaking to you on a subject that has been of great interest to me and of great importance to the peoples of the Caribbean region.I know that when many people think of the Caribbean, the immediate images of islands surrounded by sand and sea bathed in sunshine fun and frolic come to mind; that is what we see on TV By extension the exotic jungles of the South America in particular my native land Guyana , the only English speaking country on the continent of South… [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm
Thank you for the opportunity of speaking to you on a subject that has been of great interest to me and of great importance to the peoples of the Caribbean region. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 10:20 pm
While this is not implausible, the force of the suggestion is diminished by the fact that Plummer was a readymade scheme too, as the judgment of Walton J. at first instance suggests, and also by a subsequent decision of the House of Lords (Moodie v IRC 65 TC 610), in which Lord Templeman expressed the view that Plummer would have been decided differently had “the Ramsay principle” been applied. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:32 am
District Judge Purdy noted, Very powerful observations do come from Lord Phillips, PSC in Norris v USA [2010] UKSC 9 (@ para 67) … His Lordship said “extradition proceedings should not become the occasion for a debate about the most convenient forum for criminal proceedings…Unless the judge reaches the conclusion that the scales are finely balanced he should not enter into any enquiry as to the possibility of prosecution in this country. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:31 am
Judge Purdy respectfully endorsed the 'very powerful observations' of Lord Phillips, President of the Supreme Court, in Norris v USA [2010] UKSC 9, who disapproved of general considerations but accepted the exceptional circumstances in which Article 8 would lead to a discharge of an otherwise perfectly proper extradition request. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
22 June 2011 (b) Who was the Lord Justice Lord Justice Leveson (c) What were the cases? [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:02 am
Of particular interest to Episcopalians is the current case in Massachusetts of Gill v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 6:39 am
The third case, from Chicago, is SKF USA, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:11 pm
It is correct to say that deceptive similarity is a question for the tribunal of fact and is not a matter for any witness to decide but, as the passage cited by Gummow J from Lord Diplock’s judgment in General Electric Co (USA) v General Electric Co Ltd [1972] 1 WLR 729 at 738 makes plain, to say that a question is for the tribunal of fact or to describe it as a “jury question” does not mean that evidence going to that question is impermissible. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
October 28th of this month will mark the one year anniversary of the publication of the Anti-SLAPP Panel’s Report to the Attorney General on anti-SLAPP legislation. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 2:19 pm
The locals were just as shocked and upset as anyone else, belying the state-sponsored USA bashing we had been soaked with throughout our trip. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 12:14 pm
In Salem Advocate Bar Association v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:51 pm
Her Honour quoted Derby & Co Ltd v Weldon [1990] 1 Ch 65 at 81 (CA), where Lord Donaldson of Lymington MR referred to the possibility of barring the right to defend of a defendant with no assets within the jurisdiction who breaches a Mareva injunction freezing those assets. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 11:01 am
For example, because the USA has its famous “absence of malice” defence based upon the landmark New York Times v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
Allowing NML Capital’s appeal, the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Clarke, Mance, Collins and Walker) held that it was entitled to do so. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:59 pm
In WIC Radio Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 8:25 am
Lord (Mo. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 9:59 am
Yesterday’s infuriating opinion by SCOTUS in the Westboro Baptist Church case (Snyder v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm
The case of Parkwood Leisure Limited v Alemo-Herron and others will be heard from Wednesday 13 to Thursday 14 April 2011, also by Lords Hope, Walker, Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
