Search for: "Love v. Sharp"
Results 121 - 140
of 263
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2008, 8:00 am
C'mon, just take a guess, knowing how juries love to stick it to insurance companies, even when the plaintiff is a government agency. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 8:00 am
C'mon, just take a guess, knowing how juries love to stick it to insurance companies, even when the plaintiff is a government agency. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 4:08 pm
One such instance is Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and others [2014] EWHC 3867 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision of Mr Justice Nugee of 21 November.Readers may remember that this trade mark spat has already featured several times on this blog. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
Gawker and Sheldon v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 7:16 am
” Certified Conflict Case Davis v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
That is only one of many discoveries his fresh eyes and sharp mind spotted. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:02 am
Sullivan, Gertz v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 3:41 pm
Keep a sharp eye on the weather. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm
” Plaintiffs who lose are also described as fun-loving: loving Tolkien, loving Tiger King enough to tattoo it, etc. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 11:21 am
The case, Loving v IRS, was filed last year on March 13, 2012, in response to regulations put forth by the IRS in an effort to monitor tax preparers. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 4:28 am
Article Four further stated as follows:As an extremely loving and devoted parent, I found that the love, care and concern which I lavished on my daughter was not acknowledged or returned in any way by my daughter. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:11 am
Sharp and the Supreme Court’s 1967 opinion in Loving v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:40 pm
Florida, being argued at 10, and Sullivan v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 7:04 am
Aside from the inevitable coarseness of the filters, if this is nudging it is nudging with sharp elbows. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:03 am
A smiling TV 2 Norway (new owner of C More) CEO possibly pictured before the CJEU rulingLast week this blog reported on the latest decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on the right of communication/making available to the public within Article 3 of the InfoSoc Directive, this being C More Entertainment AB v Linus Sandberg, C-279/13.BackgroundAs readers will remember, this was yet another reference for a preliminary ruling from seemingly… [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 9:07 am
State v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:30 am
Amongst others, lovers of all things copyright levies are probably looking forward to the decision in Case C-463/12 Copydan Båndkopi [on which see 1709 Blog post here], a reference for a preliminary ruling from apparent copyright-loving Member State Denmark, seeking clarification as to copyright levies and their calculation, including consideration of technological protection measures [on TPMs, see the recent decision in Case… [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:25 am
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Bowker v Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, heard 21 October 2010 (Sharp J). [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 8:00 am
Lowe v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
And many litigants would love pseudonymity. [read post]
