Search for: "Lucky v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 977
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
After tentatively settling a class action alleging that Godiva Chocolates violated federal law by including too many credit card numerals on its receipts, the chocolatier catches a lucky break: The en banc Eleventh Circuit (over three lengthy dissents) throws out the case on standing grounds, concluding that this "bare procedural violation" is not sufficient to cause an injury under the Supreme Court's ruling in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:39 am by John Elwood
  The other relisted petitions were not so lucky. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:00 am by Jeffrey Bellin
Discussion The basic test for identifying a Fourth Amendment seizure comes from Justice Potter Stewart’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:04 pm by The Regulatory Review Staff
Supreme Court’s landmark environmental decision in Michigan v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
” This chapter discusses the attacks on the rule of law by the President and some in his orbit, including: (i) the rule of law; (ii) criticisms of laws by the President; (iii) The Hatch Act; (iv) other examples of violations; (v) military law; and (vi) pardons. 12.2 Rule of Law The President of the United States takes an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 11:18 am
Indeed, the dissent claims that the reasoning behind our unpublished 10- paragraph disposition leaves readers lucky to escape “disaster” or even death by “dysentery. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 2:05 pm by SCOTUStalk
And I was representing the United States as an amicus to Ohio, and I had not actually written the briefs in this case. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 3:05 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Cheryl Mills, her former Chief of Staff at the State Department, was not so lucky. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm by Patricia Hughes
However, I often find that time is an elusive concept and for me the “nearness” of Noble v. [read post]