Search for: "Lujan v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 148
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2010, 7:05 pm by Matt C. Bailey
Significantly, the Court was careful to note that pleading the requisite degree of “injury” for purposes of Prop 64 standing is not onerous:We also relied on the United States Supreme Court's description of "injury in fact" for federal court standing purposes as " 'an invasion of a legally protected interest which is (a) concrete and particularized . . . and (b) "actual or imminent, not 'conjectural' or 'hypothetical,'… [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 2:04 pm
If the proposed exchange does not occur, the land will continue to be owned by the United States. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:43 am
United States of America (C.D.Cal. filed Mar. 9, 2009) on the motion of the California Attorney General, and has done so on narrow, procedural grounds, without reaching the merits of the due process and equal-protection claims:As Plaintiffs' marriage is valid within California, they cannot present an injury with respect to the recognition of their marriage by the State of California under Lujan [v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 11:52 am
City of San Diego, No. 05-56366 In the context of standing under Article III, the three elements of Lujan v. [read post]