Search for: "MARKS v. STATE" Results 121 - 140 of 21,412
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
Originalism was identified by the New Right in the 1980s as a way to institutionalize the “traditional family” policies of the Reagan Revolution and reverse the civil rights advances of the Warren Court and its progeny, most notably Roe v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by fjhinojosa
Casto’s article Robert Jackson’s Critique of Trump v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:52 pm by Jocelyn Bosse
Additionally, the Mark enjoyed a narrow scope of copyright protection, and since Tesco had not copied several of the original elements of the work, the Court held that Tesco had not infringed copyright.Marcel Pemsel discussed the decisions on the validity of the trade mark applications, filed in 2015, that include the geographical name 'COMPTON'. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Reflections on FRAND 2023 marked a slight shift from the SEP-owner favourable position in the UK which followed Unwired Planet. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 12:16 am by Marcel Pemsel
Since MHCS’ trade mark has been filed prior to the accession of several Member States to the EU in 2004, 2007 and 2013, MHCS will not have to establish acquired distinctiveness for these ‘new Member States’ (Art. 209(4)(a) EUTMR). [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
(US NAP, p. 1)).In 2024, the Introduction to the 2024 US NAP took a slightly different tone:  To mark the 10th anniversary of the UNGPs on June 16, 2021, Secretary Antony Blinken announced the USG’s intent to revitalize and update the NAP. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:57 am by Gwendolyn Whidden
The strikes mark the deadliest attacks in months since Israel intensified its campaign against Iran’s allies in Syria alongside its war in Gaza. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 12:41 pm by admin
App’x 513 (5th Cir. 2013); Spiral Direct, Inc. v. [read post]